Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

James Monroe and John Adams: An Unlikely "Friendship"

By Scherr, Arthur | The Historian, Fall 2005 | Go to article overview

James Monroe and John Adams: An Unlikely "Friendship"

Scherr, Arthur, The Historian

RECENT HISTORICAL SCHOLARSHIP on the political culture of the early United States has turned from analyzing ideologies and issues to examining the personalities and motivations of the first party leaders. Within a framework often termed the "republican paradigm," an incongruous mixture of conservative, deferential, communal, Enlightenment, and individualist elements, historians have begun to stress individual friendships' power to mold partisan loyalties. Political scientist James Sterling Young, whose landmark analysis, The Washington Community, 1801-1828 (1966), discovered the existence of congressional boarding-house "blocs" during Jefferson's presidency, was probably the first student to emphasize the role of "friendship" in shaping political identity. (1) However, with the recent publication of Joanne B. Freeman's Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic, the concept, "friendship," has matured as a leitmotif commingling individual, social, and political interaction. In Freeman's analysis, the concept constituted "the central organizing force of national politics" during the 1790s. "Clearly, friend was a charged word with a multitude of meanings, reflecting the bond between the personal and the political that characterized the period's politics," she observes of that formative decade. The number of friends one had measured one's potential political clout. "Indeed," she writes, "politicians often evaluated a politician's skill and power on the basis of his ability to attract and steer friends." Rather than merely a personal bond between those whose affinity stemmed from what we call the "chemistry" between them, or arose from shared likes and dislikes, in the political arena one looked to accrue advantages from one's "friends." (2)

Nonetheless, in ways that Freeman overlooks, eighteenth-century "friendship" was a republican euphemism for the persistence of old-fashioned aristocratic patronage. If a person of higher social or economic status was willing to help one gain occupational or political advancement, or perform numerous small favors, for him he became known as one's "friend." Thus, even in the raucous politics of the 1790s, "friendship" was the accouterment of an "aristocratic" society, tempered and calibrated by linkages of hierarchy and subordination. During the Puritan era, when society was considered an organic whole, the disharmony or selfishness that dissolved friendships was condemned. By the mid-1700s, self-reliant American republicans, impugning relationships of "dependency," preferred to label mutual obligations with a milder surrogate term: "friendship." As Jean-Jacques Rousseau famously put it in the Social Contract, explaining the source of legitimacy of the General Will and democratic government, "The undertakings which bind us to the social body are obligatory only because they are mutual; and their nature is such that in fulfilling them we cannot work for others without working for ourselves." After the American Revolution, individuals received praise for their economic success, especially when they accomplished it through their own talents, without the intervention of influential "friends" or patrons. (3)

Gordon Wood was the first scholar to convincingly link "friendship" to the republican mentalite in its inchoate form within the British monarchy. Even under George III, "friendship" was integral to the republican Weltanshauung: "Although they seldom mentioned the term, good monarchical subjects nonetheless celebrated republicanism for its morality, its freedom, its sense of friendship and civic duty, and its vision of society." (4) By the early 1750s, personal attachments and connections were described as "friendship," even when existing between the socially unequal. Relationships as diverse as kin networks and those between patrons and customers might be considered under the heading of "friendship." (5)

The new historiographical importance of the eighteenth-century concept of "friendship" is enhanced by its curious, even self-contradictory connotations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

James Monroe and John Adams: An Unlikely "Friendship"


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.