Judge Says Syndicate Exclusivity Is Not a Violation of Antitrust Law

By Fitzgerald, Mark | Editor & Publisher, October 15, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Judge Says Syndicate Exclusivity Is Not a Violation of Antitrust Law


Fitzgerald, Mark, Editor & Publisher


EXCLUSIVITY RULES FOR syndicated features do not violate antitrust laws, a Chicago judge said in an opinion that could torpedo a major challenge to these agreements.

In the 51-page opinion, U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald A. Guzman recommended that U.S. District Court Judge John A. Nordberg dismiss the wideranging lawsuit the Daily Herald in Arlington Heights, Ill., filed last December against Chicago's two major dailies and eight major syndicates and news services.

Guzman's recommendation is only a preliminary step in a battle that is almost certain to result in an appeal -- perhaps as far as the Supreme Court -- no matter which way Nordberg rules.

The Daily Herald suit aims at the heart of an industry practice that for decades has rankled small papers that labor in the shadow of the big metros: territorial exclusivity provisions that have the effect of denying them the most popular comics, columns and supplemental news services.

Daily Herald publisher Paddock Publications contends in the suit that its growth in the Chicago market has been stunted because the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times have locked up such syndicated comics as "Doonesbury," "Peanuts," "Garfield," "Calvin and Hobbes" and the Dave Barry and "Dear Abby" columns. (E&P, Dec. 18, 1993, p. 29).

Guzman concluded that even if everything the Daily Herald alleges in its suit is true, syndicate arrangements with newspapers do not violate the nation's major antitrust statutes -- the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

In essence, Guzman said that while it may be true that syndicate exclusivity hurts the Daily Herald and helps its big-city competitors, the suburban paper will find no remedy in antitrust law.

Guzman concluded that "pro-competitive effects of the exclusive licensing arrangements outweigh the competitive hurdle they place in the path of competitors in the Chicago newspaper market.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Judge Says Syndicate Exclusivity Is Not a Violation of Antitrust Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?