The Federal Judicial Law Clerk Hiring Problem and the Modest March 1 Solution

By Becker, Edward R.; Breyer, Stephen G. et al. | The Yale Law Journal, October 1994 | Go to article overview

The Federal Judicial Law Clerk Hiring Problem and the Modest March 1 Solution


Becker, Edward R., Breyer, Stephen G., Calabresi, Guido, The Yale Law Journal


I. Introduction

In September 1993 the Judicial Conference of the United States unanimously adopted the following resolution.

The Judicial Conference recognizes as the Benchmark Starting Date for clerkship interviews March 1 of the year preceding the year in which the clerkship begins.(1)

As submitted to the Judicial Conference, the resolution contained the following explanatory note:

The Benchmark Starting Date is not meant to be binding. The Conference expects that judges will make a good faith effort not to interview candidates before that date, but special circumstances might sometimes call for an earlier interview. This Benchmark Starting Date will be made known to the law schools, with the suggestion that faculties be urged not to transmit letters of recommendation until approximately February 1, which is about the time when third semester grades are available. The suggestion will also be made that law schools advise students that they are not obliged to accept the first offer tendered (there being widespread confusion on this point).(2)

This modest "March 1 Solution" followed years of failed attempts to deal with a process that had seen federal judges hiring law clerks as early as October of their second year of law school. Hiring clerks early on in their law school careers overemphasized first-year grades, caused unnecessary disruption of classes, considerably increased the cost of travel for interviews, vastly raised the anxiety level for the students, and impaired the reputation of the federal judiciary.

The competition among judges to hire prime law clerks tended to push hiring dates earlier and earlier. By 1992, law students scrambled as early as September of their third semester to apply to judges rumored to be hiring. In the fall of 1993, in an attempt to arrest the advancing trend, the Judicial Conference adopted the March 1 Solution. After only one year in operation, it has been strongly endorsed by federal judges, law students, professors, and administrators. Although the Solution may not have been ideal in theory, in practice it was a success.

In order to understand why both judges and law schools should continue to support the March 1 Solution, we sketch the history of prior attempts to solve the law clerk hiring problem, all of which failed to achieve sufficient judicial support to provide lasting reform. We then examine why other approaches to the problem are inadequate and offer our recommendations for improving on the March 1 Solution.

II. A Few Pages of History(3)

Before the mid-1970's, the prevailing practice of federal judges was to select law clerks during the fall of their third year of law school. Gradually, the judges' hiring date crept earlier and earlier until most selections were made in the spring of the students, second year. Since the late 1970's, federal judges have made six separate attempts to reform this process.(4)

In 1978, law school deans succeeded in persuading the Association of American Law Schools to issue recommended guidelines for hiring, but most federal judges did not abide by them. In March 1983, the Judicial Conference requested that judges not consider applications before September 15 of the students' third year of law school; by the 1984 season, however, early hiring was rampant. Following a survey of judges, reactions to the September 15 benchmark, the Judicial Conference abandoned the experiment.

In 1986, Stephen G. Breyer, then a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, attempted to build a consensus for the 1986 season by urging federal appellate judges not to consider student applications before April 1.(5) A large number of judges responded favorably, both in writing and in actual practice. In 1987 and especially in 1988, however, the April 1 date was largely ignored, many of the judges interviewed and hired in March, and a few in February, of the students' second year. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Federal Judicial Law Clerk Hiring Problem and the Modest March 1 Solution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.