A Cancer Control Strategy and Deliberative Federalism: Modernizing Health Care and Democratizing Intergovernmental Relations

By Prince, Michael J. | Canadian Public Administration, Winter 2006 | Go to article overview

A Cancer Control Strategy and Deliberative Federalism: Modernizing Health Care and Democratizing Intergovernmental Relations


Prince, Michael J., Canadian Public Administration


Developing the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (CSCC) has involved a model for conducting intergovernmental and inter-sectoral relations markedly different from executive federalism, the dominant style of Canadian intergovernmental relations since the 1960s. (1) This style refers to the dominant role played by cabinet ministers and senior public servants in managing the policy, political, and financial relationships among the federal, provincial, and territorial governments.

This article contributes to understanding contemporary intergovernmental relations and health care reform by discussing a major public health issue, outlining the features of the executive federalism and collaborative federalism models, and explicating the emerging elements of a new approach that we can call deliberative federalism. The analysis, particularly in the later sections of the article, addresses the theoretical and practical question of how federalism interacts with policy-making, reform efforts, and societal actors.

The central line of argument is that the CSCC contributes to advancing the development of Canada's health care system and federal system of governance. As a focal point for cooperation between state and social institutions, the CSCC is an inclusive network of experts and an integrated knowledge transfer system to inform policy-making and practices across jurisdictions. The Strategy supplements, rather than replaces, the traditional federal/provincial/territorial (FPT) process of meetings. It does so by respecting the primary provincial jurisdiction in health care, incorporating the full participation of non-governmental groups at decision-making tables, informing discussions and making decisions with evidence-based advice, and investing in data-gathering and knowledge transfer. The result is wide and open access to state-of-the-art prevention and management information regarding cancer care and cancer control.

Cancer control as a public policy issue

Several aspects of cancer provide an understanding of the complexity of issues and need for flexibility in public health administration and policy formation. The incidence of cancer in this country is obvious: one in four Canadians will die from the disease. (2) At least half of all cancers can be prevented by early detection, such as through reductions in tobacco consumption, increased active living, and improved healthy eating. Early integrated clinical and psycho-social intervention seems more effective than later interventions.

The causes of cancer are complex and multiple; they include individual responsibility and personal decisions as well as systemic factors of human and natural environments. Cultural values are potentially as important as the more tangible factors such as biology and the intake of toxins. Since targeting interventions is an imprecise science, public health policy needs to accommodate the testing of various models to arrive at the best treatment for the time. Individual experience of cancer patients varies by geographical region and as they progress from one disease state to another. Cancer services are highly fragmented across the country, with faulty or antiquated equipment in some places. Over the last decade, increases have occurred in waiting times for radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and other systemic therapies, with some patients sent out of the country for care. A continued lack of supportive and palliative care for patients and their families is evident.

Cancer is a major charge on health budgets. Reports both in Canada and internationally portray cancer as an epidemic or "leading killer" and as a "looming crisis" that will overwhelm the health care system in the next decade or so unless comprehensive national action is taken. The problem will most likely get worse, due to the aging of the Canadian population, among other factors. An increase in cancer patients will have a major impact on productivity levels within the older cohorts, affecting government tax receipts and expenditure associated with these age groups. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Cancer Control Strategy and Deliberative Federalism: Modernizing Health Care and Democratizing Intergovernmental Relations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.