Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Gun Control and Rates of Firearms Violence in Canada and the United States: A Comment

By: Lester, David; Leenaars, Antoon A. | Canadian Journal of Criminology, October 1994 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Gun Control and Rates of Firearms Violence in Canada and the United States: A Comment


Lester, David, Leenaars, Antoon A., Canadian Journal of Criminology


Writing in the Canadian Journal of Criminology, Mundt (1990, 32, January, 137-154) concluded that the Canadian legislation in 1977 regulating the acquisition of firearms had little perceptible impact on crime, suicides, and accidental deaths. Aside from several figures and charts, Mundt presented no statistical analyses to support this assertion. This comment attempts to demonstrate that his conclusion as far as suicide is concerned was wrong -- the firearms legislation did have an impact on suicide by firearms.

The suicide rate by firearms (see Table 1) in the eight years prior to the legislation (1969 to 1976) was increasing. For a simple linear regression, the unstandardized regression coefficient was 0.163 (p = .0003). Similarly, the suicide rate by all other methods was increasing (b = 0.097, p = .08), as were the total suicide rate (b = 0.261, p = .003) and the percentage of suicides using firearms (b = 0.608, p = .01).

For the eight-year period after the passage of the firearms legislation (1978 to 1985), the suicide rate by firearms decreased (b = -0.131, p = .04). Mundt suggested that, even if the suicide rate by firearms were to decrease, people might switch to other methods for suicide. This was not the case, since the suicide rate by all other methods did not change during this period (b = -0.019, p = .78) and neither did the total suicide rate (b = -0.150, p = .17). However, the percentage of suicides using firearms did decrease (b = -0.574, p = .03).

For interest, data for the period 1986 to 1991 are also included in Table 1, from which it can be seen that the reduction in the use of firearms for suicidal behaviour has persisted.

Table 1 Suicide rates by method in Canada, 1969 to 1991 (raw data

obtained from Statistics Canada; rates calculated by the present authors)

Year                 Suicide rate    % Suicides
       total   firearm   all other   by firearms
                         methods
1969   10.91    3.57      7.34           32.7
1970   11.33    3.74      7.59           33.0
1971   11.86    4.28      7.58           36.1
1972   12.19    4.29      7.90           35.2
1973   12.58    4.31      8.27           34.3
1974   12.98    4.57      8.41           35.2
1975   12.37    4.64      7.73           37.5
1976   12.76    4.76      8.00           37.3
1977   14.26    5.46 … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?