The Grinch's Gift

By Corn, David | The Nation, November 7, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Grinch's Gift


Corn, David, The Nation


Thank you, God, for Newt Gingrich. That's the prayer Washington Democrats whisper each night before ducking beneath their covers. Were it not for the pugnacious minority whip, the self-pitying Dems, facing an electoral stomping, would be without hope and without a clue. Throughout the summer, White House honchos, Democratic National Committee jefes and Congressional leadership havies stared dazedly at memos and charts predicting their losses: thirty, forty, fifty, sixty seats in the House--forty will turn Gingrich into the Speaker--and enough in the Senate to place Bob Dole and the G.O.P. in command (Al D'Amato chairing the banking committee; Jesse Helms controlling Foreign Relations; Orrin Hatch dictating Judiciary; Bob Packwood tending Finance). The most pathetic moans emanated from Democratic ranks: The economy is strong (by conventional measurements) and voters want us impaled--Why oh why? President Clinton's poor-me routine (I passed NAFTA, cut the deficit and took on the Haitian putschists, but I get no respect) was flopping. Concocted by pollster Stanley Greenberg, the strategy called for the maligned President to recite his achievements and await the appreciation of grateful voters. It wasn't working. Would-be voters told pollsters they didn't think Clinton had done much for them; many even doubted the deficit had been trimmed.

Then along came Gingrich. He brought scores of Republican candidates to the steps of the Capitol and had each initial his "Contract With America," a warmed-over stew of Reaganesque policy proposals--tax cuts, more military spending, the anti-choice gag rule. Aha! exclaimed the dejected Democrats. We have a target: Republicans who want to take us back to the 1980s--a time celebrated only in the seminar rooms of the Heritage Foundation. Moreover, Newt-o-nomics carries a trillion-dollar shortfall (over seven years) and threatens such popular programs as Social Security and Medicare. B.C.--Before Contract--Republicans challenging Democratic incumbents could run as anti-Washington crusaders and didn't have to defend a record of their own. Now Republicans are saddled with the Grinch's ugly baby. In Colorado, lawyer Bill Eggert was campaigning against Pat Schroeder with the slogan "Twenty-two years is enough." As someone who had never held office, Eggert was tough to nail. But once he inked the Contract, Schroeder zeroed in on Eggert's endorsement of voodoo economics II and proclaimed, "Twenty-two minutes of Eggert is enough."

"Gingrich didn't need to do anything," says one senior D.N.C. official. "If he had kept his mouth shut, the Republicans would have taken over both houses of Congress, no problem. The Contract was such a gift." Why would a clever fellow like Gingrich pull such a boner? Had he spent too much time listening to Washington pundits who decried his party's negativism (which, according to Democratic polls, didn't bother the voting public)? Had he become too giddy at the thought of moving into Tom Foley's office? Truth is, Gingrich is the Wile E.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Grinch's Gift
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?