A Real Estate Appraisal Checklist: A Better Understanding of an Appraisal's Details Ensures More Meaningful Appraisal Reviews and Compliance with Heightened Regulatory Requirements. This Article Offers a Checklist and Discusses the Requirements for the Items on It

By Zoeller, Mark | The RMA Journal, November 2006 | Go to article overview

A Real Estate Appraisal Checklist: A Better Understanding of an Appraisal's Details Ensures More Meaningful Appraisal Reviews and Compliance with Heightened Regulatory Requirements. This Article Offers a Checklist and Discusses the Requirements for the Items on It


Zoeller, Mark, The RMA Journal


An appraisal is an assemblage of data, assumptions, calculations, discussions, analyses, opinions, presentation formats, and requirements that should result in the appraiser's credible opinion of market value. The credibility of that market value increases when both banker and appraiser follow best practices, which begin with federal appraisal regulations that also require adherence to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). (1)

A banker recently asked me if I had a checklist that loan officers could use to review appraisals quickly. I do not, because I believe it's more important to review appraisals meaningfully. Although several sections of USPAP do not apply to real estate, the 2004 edition consisted of 229 pages of small type. Regulations and the USPAP are both lengthy. So, while my checklist may not be as speedy as some may like, it does distill the regulations while capturing their essence.

Examples that I have seen of questionable appraisal credibility include the following:

* The bank accepts an appraisal ordered by the borrower (the bank does not have the legal authority to accept it).

* The appraiser describes the wrong property.

* The appraiser uses stale, comparable-sales data without showing why the stale data is meaningful.

* The appraiser makes a significant mathematical error in calculating a capitalization rate.

Recently, I came across an appraisal reviewed by a second appraiser. The originating appraiser stated that a party other than the borrower owned the real estate. He appraised the borrower's ownership interest, though, as fee simple. When I asked the loan officer about this seeming discrepancy, he said that the originating appraiser had obtained the ownership information from a legal service and not from title documents. By reviewing the preliminary title report, the bank found that the borrower had held title for several years. Neither the originating nor the reviewing appraiser had recognized this discrepancy between the statement of ownership and the appraised ownership interest.

I uncovered another credibility issue in May 2006 while reviewing a partially completed tract home project. The appraisal stated that the project would be completed and sold out by December 2005 and that it would have no models. In fact, however, not only was the project incomplete, but it had 10 models. The loan officer knew this, but neither the appraiser nor the review appraiser did, and the loan officer himself did not review the appraisal. Because the loan officer placed all responsibility for the review onto someone not as familiar with the project, the bank was using an appraisal with questionable credibility.

I have worked with more than a hundred banks and thousands of loan officers since the passage of FIRREA (Federal Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989) prompted appraisal regulations. I have seen several appraisal-review checklists filled out to show that appraisals conform to regulations and to USPAP when, in fact, they do not. Some of these lenders did not have the training to review an appraisal for credibility.

Both regulations and USPAP have had recent major changes or interpretations.

* In September 2005, the federal banking regulators published the Interagency Frequently Asked Questions on Residential Tract Development Lending. This is a major interpretation and statement of the requirements for appraisals of residential tracts.

* On July 1, 2006, USPAP changed significantly--the biggest change in several years. The changes brought the scope of work requirement out of Standards Rule 1, expanded it, and created a separate Standards of Work Rule (SWR). It also moved other requirements around and deleted others. One bank's internal appraiser told me that he was disheartened by the USPAP changes. His external appraisers had only recently seemed to fully understand what he wanted, which was, most of the time, a complete-summary appraisal. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Real Estate Appraisal Checklist: A Better Understanding of an Appraisal's Details Ensures More Meaningful Appraisal Reviews and Compliance with Heightened Regulatory Requirements. This Article Offers a Checklist and Discusses the Requirements for the Items on It
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.