Party Politics or Coalition Activism?

By Mackenzie, David | Canadian Dimension, December-January 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Party Politics or Coalition Activism?

Mackenzie, David, Canadian Dimension

Canadian labour must come to grips with questions about the nature of its political affiliations and practices. The question is: Does the Canadian labour movement orient its political activity through an electorally competitive social democratic party or does it reconceive itself as essentially a partner of extra-parliamentary social coalitions? Party politics or coalition politics?

The issue is not new. Since the sixties, academics have talked about the rise of the new social movements (feminism, environmentalism, disarmament, localized neighbourhood formations, and single-issue groups) as the most important demographic development on the Left, particularly as contrasted with the downward trend lines throughout the Western world in the industrial working class base of social democratic movements.

Over the past two decades most of us have worked with the new movements out of support for the obvious justice of their particular purposes. There has always been a significant overlap among party activists and movement/ coalition activists.

Differences over tactics, strategies, and priorities have also always been present. Sometimes, as in the case of the Ontario "Campaign for an Activist Party" initiative in the mid-eighties, there have been organized attempts to get the NDP to re-direct some of its own energies away from electoral contest and toward building support for social coalitions. These attempts have not been frequent, but they do highlight tensions between the differing visions of Left politics.

The current debate is starting to feel like an either/or question in ways it didn't previously. We can no longer assume that the differences between the social democratic approach and the extra-parliamentary approach can be easily reconciled. Many in the new movement camp are uninterested in reconciliation. While I believe ultimate rapprochement is still achievable and certainly desirable, I also suggest that labour has to deal with the tensions and conflicts straight up if we have any hope of getting clear about our purposes.

Here are some over-simplifications for the sake of discussion.

* A defining feature of the party and labour approach has been the appeal to an all-encompassing vision. It takes shape as an inclusive political program that we campaign for and hope to implement. By contrast, it is a feature of single-issue groups and even broader movements not to view their purposes or purpose as components of a package, but rather as intrinsic priorities that should not be subject to the interest-balancing that goes into constructing a party program.

* That means the coalitionist's relationship to the party is different from the partisan's. The latter sees virtue in the total package and encompassing vision. The former makes judgments concerning the faithfulness of a particular policy and the priority it is accorded by the party. This is a contingent and instrumental view of the party.

* Election campaigns are not a primary trauma of coalition politics which relieves its activists of feeling responsible for a certain body of unromantic and often mind-numbing detail work. Coalitionists are normally tireless advocates of their cause, but are also normally able to spend more time on the content of the animating issue(s). This is particularly gratifying and exhilarating for those with a good education and verbal skills; they get little buzz from the technical campaign preoccupations of the party activist (indeed in my experience, many view such concerns with disdain). The party is a site of lobbying rather than something to be campaigned for and elected.

* This mercenary or instrumental view of party politics amounts to a denial of real-life politics on the ground. The instrumental view leads logically to appeals for so-called strategic voting, which in the Canadian context means electing Liberals. Some frank coalition activists even advocate a merging of Liberals and New Democrats.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Party Politics or Coalition Activism?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?