Breaking the Law to Break into the Black: Patent Infringement as a Business Strategy

By Wrzesinski, Eric C. | Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Breaking the Law to Break into the Black: Patent Infringement as a Business Strategy


Wrzesinski, Eric C., Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review


INTRODUCTION

I. APPLICABILITY OF U.S. PATENT INFRINGEMENT LAWS TO
  CORPORATIONS

  A. Current U.S. Patent Laws Deterring Unintentional
    Infringement

  B. Current U.S. Patent Laws Deterring Willful
    Infringement

II. ANALYSIS OF INADEQUATE PROTECTIONS OF U.S. PATENT
  INFRINGEMENT LAWS TO PATENT OWNERS

  A. Inadequate Protections Afforded by Statutory Damages
   and Remedies to U.S. Patent Owners

  B. Inadequate Protections Afforded by the Read Factors Test
   to U.S. Patent Owners

III. PROPOSAL FOR CHANGES TO CURRENT U.S. PATENT
  INFRINGEMENT LAWS FOR UNIVERSAL FEDERAL

  JUDICIAL ADOPTION

  CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

Corporations and businesses make important decisions every day that affect their financial viability and market image relative to other competitors in a particular industry. For those organizations that produce innovative technologies, the aggregate of the many decisions made throughout the various stages of development manifests itself through the final product presented to the marketplace or utilized by the organization internally. However, as evidenced by the drastic increase in patent infringement cases brought before U.S. courts each year (there were 2,120 patent suits filed in 19981 and filings increased 111% from 1991 to 20002), circumstances in which organizations produce inventions that infringe the legal rights of other entities occur routinely in the United States.

U.S. patent laws (3) influence the decision-making processes for these technology-producing organizations through the economic consequences (the costs of litigating an average patent case are estimated to be one to four million dollars (4)) and time costs resulting from actual and potential patent infringement litigation, settlements, and liability rulings. Yet despite organizations' knowledge of the possible legal and business repercussions associated with patent infringement, a multitude of U.S. court cases addressing this issue continue to arise each year. (5) Accordingly, a proper analysis of the phenomenon of patent infringement prompts the natural inquiry of whether firms consciously decide to infringe certain patents as a sound business strategy or whether such cases arise spontaneously due to incomplete and careless research of prior art by the infringing firms. Regardless of what empirical research studies indicate as the most frequent explanation, (6) patent infringement may remain an effective business strategy for technology-producing firms, even when not employed willfully, due to the inadequate deterrence function of current U.S. patent laws.

I. APPLICABILITY OF U.S. PATENT INFRINGEMENT LAWS TO CORPORATIONS

A. Current U.S. Patent Laws Deterring Unintentional Infringement U.S. patent laws do not explicitly consider the intention of the alleged infringer in determining whether that entity or person is liable for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. [sub section] 271, 284, 285, (7) and the "doctrine of equivalents." (8) Consequently, federal courts are not explicitly required to consider the fact that a company willfully produced an infringing technology when determining its liability or the remedy granted to the plaintiff under a facial interpretation of these aforementioned laws. (9) As a result, the deterrence effect of these patent laws works to instill a more comprehensive and careful research effort of prior art by inventors in order to discourage and minimize unintentional infringement.

Under 35 U.S.C. [section] 284, the damages assessed by the jury and/or judge serve this deterrence function against unintentional infringement and are distinct from those awarded in willful infringement cases, (10) except when the unintentional infringement is also considered "exceptional" by the court. (11) However, the inability of these patent laws (12) to effectively deter potential infringers from consciously developing a strategy to infringe upon a patented technology creates a tangential incentive for firms to develop business plans directed at violating these laws. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Breaking the Law to Break into the Black: Patent Infringement as a Business Strategy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.