Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Pluralism: And the 'Isms of Art History

By Prince, Mark | Art Monthly, February 2006 | Go to article overview

Pluralism: And the 'Isms of Art History

Prince, Mark, Art Monthly

It is difficult to reconstruct the zeal with which artists of the first half of the last century projected their exclusive versions of the future. In the meantime, this constellation of movements, each representing a particular set of utopian beliefs, has dissolved into a relativist free-for-all. Futurism, Constructivism, Suprematism, Vorticism: among this grand roll call, pluralism seems to co-opt its last letters somewhat apologetically. Coming in gangs, and dressing up statements in the form of didactic manifestos, there was an air of propaganda about their methods, and a tendency to develop a dialogue with the dominant political ideologies of the moment, either in the form of violent rejection or by dabbling, and sometimes merging, with their objectives. The politics dabbled in return, but only as far as expediency allowed and never for long.

The poet FT Marinetti, founder and main spokesperson of the Futurists--the most theatrically avant-garde of these movements (and the truest to the origins of the term in military vocabulary)--assiduously courted Mussolini, proposing his visions of technological prowess and 'hygienic' war as the ideal visual equivalent of the burgeoning Italian Fascist movement, only to be rejected finally in favour of an art more redolent of Ancient Rome. In Soviet Russia, by 1921, Lenin had already decided against the usefulness of the Constructivists.

These were artists who idealised a radical divorce from past aesthetics. Marinetti's first manifesto envisaged flooding the museums: 'Oh the joy of seeing the glorious old canvases bobbing adrift on those waters, discoloured and shredded'. If this required more fuel than they could muster, perhaps they could hitch a ride on the back of one of the versions of totalitarianism gathering momentum at the time, which were also forging a single-minded and iconoclastic way towards their own ends. Given that these were artistic philosophies which explicitly reject memory, it is ironic that the art they produced materialises so often as a catalyst for recent painting. Is this a manifestation of nostalgia for lost certainties, an attempt to ghost dogmatic narrative structures, which have long since expired, onto individualistic subjectivity? And what happens, in the process, to the political correlatives, often rebarbative, which cling to an art which is now being quoted with a postmodern irreverence? Although 'quoted' is perhaps too strong a term for an associative inhabiting of various utopian agendas, rather as an actor dons a part.

Last summer, Anselm Kiefer's exhibition at White Cube in London, 'Fur Chlebnikov', featured 30 large seascapes hung imposingly in grid-formation within a purpose-built pavilion in Hoxton Square. The dedication, 'Time, Measure of the World--Fate of the People. The New Doctrine of War: Naval Battles Recur Every 317 Years or in Multiples Thereof, for Velimir Chlebnikov' was scrawled onto the far wall. It was referring to the Russian Futurist poet Chlebnikov, whose esoteric theories on the precise historical regularity of battles at sea suggested the series. Kiefer's method is elliptical: generalised images of sea warfare only hint, through added inscriptions, at specific history (for example, the word 'Aurora', referring to the ship that fired at the Winter Palace in 1917, kick-starting the Bolshevik Revolution). What is the nature of Kiefer's affinity with a poet who called himself 'President of Planet Earth', who wished to purge all symbolism from Russian, and remake the language out of its root sounds? Manic hubris is reconfigured as weathered, rusted nostalgia, the grandeur of mythmaking. It ironises as much as it confirms the visionary triumphalism of Kiefer's own presentation.

The sheer horizon line and pseudo-deep perspective, which Kiefer has used repeatedly to describe barren, scarred earth, are here adapted to water. The simple two-zone abstraction of a Mark Rothko painting balances against the suggestion of deep traditional space, each undercutting the other's aspirations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Pluralism: And the 'Isms of Art History


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.