An Interview with Ernst Rothkopf: Reflections on Educational Psychology

By Rothkopf, Ernst; Shaughnessy, Michael F. | North American Journal of Psychology, March-April 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

An Interview with Ernst Rothkopf: Reflections on Educational Psychology


Rothkopf, Ernst, Shaughnessy, Michael F., North American Journal of Psychology


Ernst Z. Rothkopf is Cleveland E. Dodge Professor of Education, Emeritus at Teachers College, Columbia University, where he taught from 1985 until his recent retirement. He earned his Ph.D. in experimental psychology from the University of Connecticut and he has served as President Division 15 of the APA, Editor of Review of Research in Education, and has served on the Editorial Boards of Cognition and Instruction, Educational Psychology Review and the Journal of Educational Psychology. He has edited four books, published over 120 articles and has been a major influential figure in Educational Psychology for the last five decades.

NAJP: What are you currently working on, researching and writing?

ER: One of the areas in which I have been working, (on and off), for the last twenty years is the integration between background and foreground during learning. Incidental and optional elements of teaching and studying situations such as location, setting, emotional states, or the surface characteristics of examples or word problems, become automatically linked to targeted instructional information, and can later play a role in retrieval.

For example, students recall more when they are tested in the place that they have learned, or are listening to the music they heard during studying, and they are more successful in applying abstract principles or procedural rules to concrete domains that have been used as examples or exercises during teaching. General solution rules which apply to large problem spaces are applied more quickly and accurately to combinations of specific instances to which they have been applied before. I use the term particularization to refer to these adventitious associative linkages between the particulars of individual's experience and general knowledge. The notion of particularization helps us understand how one becomes an expert.

NAJP: What do you mean by "particularization" and what is its role in educational psychology?

ER: By particularization I mean the associative linkages between surface elements of problem situations and deeper knowledge elements..

Three findings from this work are particularly interesting:

1. Problems that submit to general rule-governed solutions can be solved either a) by applying a rule-governed algorithm, or b) by directly recalling an instance like the present problem to which the algorithm has been applied in the past. When both processes are initiated, (b) is faster and wins the race.

2. Particularization offers an (at least partial) account of expertise. Becoming an expert means increased sampling of the specific instances in the problem space. One reason that experts become faster is that more of their solutions come from direct memorial access to previous instances and fewer require slow algorithmic solutions.

3. The linkage of specific situational factors with instructionally foregrounded knowledge provides redundant retrieval paths and addresses for the targeted knowledge elements. The use of technological information portals such as computers and video monitors tend to leach situational context from instructional episodes (e.g. in computer-based distance education) and this has adverse effects on performance. Such leaching can be overcome by diversification of instructional locations and other means--and that is one important reason for context enrichment.

NAJP: Many years ago, you wrote about "mathemagenic activities" What is the current "state of the art" of these activities or have they fallen by the wayside? How do we control these activities?

ER: Historically, this concept emerged for me in the early sixties. The operant conditioning people were (rather unthinkingly) equating reinforcement with knowledge of results in acquiring substantive knowledge through programmed instruction. That was obviously incorrect for two reasons. First, because the cessation of feedback (KoR) did not result in anything like extinction of verbal knowledge, and second, because KoR was not a necessary condition for such learning.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

An Interview with Ernst Rothkopf: Reflections on Educational Psychology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?