Iran's Nuclear Holocaust Threat Should Be Taken Seriously

Cape Times (South Africa), March 5, 2007 | Go to article overview

Iran's Nuclear Holocaust Threat Should Be Taken Seriously


Frankly, I'm surprised that my colleague Dr Shamil Jeppie cannot comprehend a simple text. This is surely not asking too much from an historian with a decent reputation.

In his response to my article, "All this talk of a US attack on Iran carries a distinct sense of deja vu" (February 19), Jeppie refers to me as "our local neo-con voice" and a "war-monger" ("We should recall Middle East history as war clouds gather over Iran", February 28).

My article neither endorsed military action nor argued against it. I simply contended that such action is highly likely given US President George Bush's record and given Israeli views of the Tehran regime.

I also noted that one of the initial gains of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein was the "introduction of popular sovereignty". I did not claim such sovereignty was meaningful in conditions of violence. But the UN did assist in the elections and the "neocons" (and many others) considered this a positive development at the time.

Jeppie refers to Bernard Lewis as a "self-important Orientalist". That's fine; he is entitled to his opinion. The academy includes many who think differently. But that is by the way. Lewis's recent speech (not a Wall Street Journal article) was taken seriously in Israel, rightly or wrongly. And Lewis is not the only scholar to recognise apocalyptic strains within radical Shi'ism.

Nevertheless, Jeppie appears to discount all such views. Israelis, it seems to me, do not. Only recently, Benny Morris, a scholar Jeppie likes to quote when it suits him, predicted a second Holocaust, orchestrated by "the mullahs of Qom" ("This Holocaust will be different", Jerusalem Post, January 18).

Jeppie accuses me of selectivity. I find it strange that he ignored my obser-vation that "the 'neocon' dream is in tatters", "Baghdad is a war zone" and the Arab world - much to the chagrin of the Bush administration - is "not on the road to democracy". Some "neocon"! Jeppie should not confuse analysis with endorsement.

This is not to suggest I agree with his assessment of the Iranian regime. The complex divisions he identifies in that country's polity - and I am sure he is correct - could just as well have been said about Germany in the 1930s: there were those who believed the German Social Democrats and the Communists would be a counterweight to the Nazis, that Hitler was merely employing Jew-hatred to mobilise support and that he would moderate his position once in power. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Iran's Nuclear Holocaust Threat Should Be Taken Seriously
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.