Payment Systems Face More Antitrust Scrutiny

By Balto, David A. | American Banker, June 14, 1994 | Go to article overview

Payment Systems Face More Antitrust Scrutiny

Balto, David A., American Banker

The recent Justice Department suit against Electronic Payment Services Inc. was its first enforcement action involving payment systems in about 20 years. Does the suit signal increased federal antitrust scrutiny of payment systems? The answer is unequivocal yes.

Antitrust enforcement in the Justice Department is generally on the upswing under the Clinton administration. Newly appointed Assistant Attorney General Anne Bingaman has promised to revitalize antitrust enforcement.

Under her brief stewardship she has secured significant increases in the division's budget and staffing, hired serveral seasoned antitrust trial lawyers, and refocused the division's enforcement resources away from localized criminal price-fixing, and toward monopolization and other civil antitrust violations.

Sending a Signal

First impressions count for a lot, even for an enforcement agency. So it is notable that the first civil antitrust case filed in the new administration was the EPS case, involving the contractual practices within the country's largest automated teller machine network.

The department alleged that EPS had engaged in monopolistic and exclusionary practices, which caused noncompetitive prices for ATM processing. Network issues are particularly complex, especially when viewed under the prism of the antitrust laws.

This challenge represents a willingness to grapple with thorny economic arguments and seek fairly extensive relief. But most important, it represents a renewed interest in payment systems by the Justice Department.

In Ms. Bingaman's words, the action "demonstrates the department's commitment ... to insuring that this important industry is open to competition."

Payment Systems Development

A bit of historical perspective is in order. During the 1970s the Justice Department played an important role in the development of payment systems, in terms of litigation, regulatory advocacy, and business advice.

It sued two automated clearing house associations seeking access for thrifts, participated extensively in proceedings before the National Commission on Electronic Funds Transfer and other regulatory agencies, announced a challenge to the formation of an ATM network because it was "too large," and declined to approve National BankAmericard's proposed anti-duality rule.

From the perspective of credit card and ATM networks, the Justice Department was perhaps a critical player in the development of competition policy.

'More the Better'

During the Reagan-Bush administrations, the department could hardly be perceived on the enforcement agency radar. No enforcement actions were taken or even hinted at.

The department was silent as tremendous consolidation among ATM networks occurred. The department's apparently laissez faire attitude was based on concept known as the "economnics of ubiquity" which loosely translated means, "the more the better." Under this concept the merger between ATM systems seemed pro-competitive because it increased the number of cardholders and ATMs in a network, improving accessibility for consumers.

Eventually, the state attorneys general stepped into the breach. In 1990, they sued to enjoin the Visa- MasterCard point of sale joint venture, Entree, which had reportedly been given a green light at the Department. Visa and MasterCard eventually agreed to abandon Entree and have since entered with separate POS networks.

Now that the department has returned as cop on the beat, it is prudent for payment systems to reassess practice which may have been based on relatively lax antitrust enforcement. What are the practices that deserve special scrutiny:

Pricing is always one of the msot sensitive areas from an antitrust perspective. Two practices that deserve special attention are interchange fees and surcharge prohibitions.

Although credit card interchange fees survived an antitrust challenge in the mid-1980s, that precedent may be revisited. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Payment Systems Face More Antitrust Scrutiny


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.