Welfare Is Not for Sale: Campaigns against Welfare Profiteers in Milwaukee

By Reese, Ellen; Giedraitis, Vincent R. et al. | Social Justice, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview

Welfare Is Not for Sale: Campaigns against Welfare Profiteers in Milwaukee


Reese, Ellen, Giedraitis, Vincent R., Vega, Eric, Social Justice


Welfare Privatization: A New Arena of Class Struggle

CLAIMING THAT THE PRIVATIZATION OF SERVICES INCREASED THEIR COST-EFFECTIVENESS and efficiency, the United States Congress authorized the privatization of a wider range of welfare services than ever before through the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act or PRWORA. State and local governments could now offer contracts to for-profit and nonprofit private agencies for eligibility determination and welfare-to-work case management services for Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). Formerly known as Aid to Families with Dependent Children, TANF provides public assistance to low-income families, most of which are headed by women. Since t996, multibillion-dollar companies, including defense contractor Lockheed Martin, and nonprofit agencies, such as Catholic Charities, aggressively pursued contracts for welfare services. By 1999, Maximus, Inc., had become one of the leading welfare contractors, with contracts in almost every state in the U.S., including welfare-to-work contracts in 11 states (Cooper, 1998; Hartung and Washburn, 1998; Zullo, 2000: 1-3; Maximus, 1999; Murray, 1999).

This takeover of welfare services by private agencies sparked considerable opposition from labor unions, welfare recipients, and community groups, who point to examples in which privatization increased welfare expenditures, lowered service quality, reduced public accountability, and eliminated good union jobs (Reese, Giedraitis, and Vega, 2005). In this article, we examine the concerns of community and labor groups over welfare privatization in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and their efforts to resist it and to improve the delivery of welfare services. This case is of particular interest because welfare privatization was carried out so fully there. Our research is based on a combination of sources, including newspaper articles, organizational literature, and interviews with activists and local policymakers.

In most U.S. cities where welfare privatization took place, it was carried out by local officials and affected only a portion of the TANF caseload. In this case, in 1997 state officials contracted out to private agencies the administration of TANF cash aid eligibility as well as welfare-to-work case management for Milwaukee County's entire program, known there as Wisconsin Works (W-2); the county's Private Industry Council was given oversight of these agencies (AFSCME, 1998a). State officials claimed that privatization was justified because public employees were performing below the state's required standards. Union leaders, however, claim that the county's relatively high error rate was partly due to its higher-than-average caseloads and the implementation of a new computer system; they contend that the county was targeted for welfare privatization because it was home to the vast majority of the state's welfare recipients and was a Democratic stronghold in a conservative state (AFSCME District Council 48 staff, 2002; AFSCME District Council 48 official, 2002; AFSCME Local 594 official, 2001; Smith-Nightengale and Mikelson, 2000: 4).

Multimillion-dollar contracts for W-2 services were given to two for-profit agencies, Maximus and YW Works (an affiliate of YWCA), and three nonprofit private agencies, Opportunities Industrialization Center of Greater Milwaukee, United Migrant Opportunity Services, and Goodwill Industries' Employment Solutions. (1) The largest contract went to Employment Solutions, run by Will Martin, a former aide to Wisconsin's then-Governor Tommy Thompson (Schultze, 2000d). The Wisconsin Policy Institute boasted that privatization saved the state at least $10.3 million over the first two years of operation (Flaherty, 1998; Elke, 1998). Most of these savings resulted from the dramatic decline in welfare caseloads, which were partly due to the implementation of new welfare rules, tougher work requirements, and favorable labor market conditions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Welfare Is Not for Sale: Campaigns against Welfare Profiteers in Milwaukee
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.