Decatur Federal: "We Did Not Believe We Were a Target." (Department of Justice Case against Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Association, Decatur, Georgia)

ABA Banking Journal, July 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Decatur Federal: "We Did Not Believe We Were a Target." (Department of Justice Case against Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Association, Decatur, Georgia)


"Decatur Federal is not the Darth Vader of the lending business," Marian Mackle told bankers during ABA's National Retail Management Conference in April. "We were a pretty good institution until the Department of Justice got through with us."

What happened to Decatur, the first target of Justice's fair-lending campaign, could happen to you, said Mackle, who was senior vice-president for risk management at Decatur Federal Savings and Loan Association, Atlanta, during its four-year investigation by the Department of Justice. Now she is executive vice-president of Nova Financial Corp., Atlanta, a provider of outsourcing services to banks.

No warnings

For one thing, the institution received no hints of trouble before or during Justice's investigation.

"Decatur always enjoyed a good reputation with our regulators," Mackle said. "I can say that because 1 worked for the Office of Thrift Supervision before I joined the bank." Decatur never received a discrimination complaint from a regulatory agency, and the Department of Justice never received a discrimination complaint about the thrift.

The S&L was doing the right fair-lending things--it had a second review program for denied mortgage applications, it sponsored an education program for first-time home buyers and credit seminars, and it had a number of fair-lending and CRA outreach programs. It was a member of the Atlanta Mortgage Consortium; it participated in affordable housing programs sponsored by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, a state program that renovated homes in impoverished or minority areas, and other housing and mortgage programs.

Decatur's disparity ratio was at about the middle of the pack of metropolitan-area Atlanta lenders.

So why was Decatur chosen? Mackle's guess was that Decatur, the largest residential mortgage lender in Atlanta, was the only institution that had enough mortgage applications from African-American people to render a sampling valid.

Mackle pointed out that Justice is no longer limiting its cases to large, high-profile lenders; $18 million-assets Blackpipe State Bank, Martin, S.D. is a target, for example.

The search for a test case was prompted by the "Color of Money" articles the Atlanta Journal- Constitution published in I988 that accused banks of redlining. The following year, Justice sent letters to 64 Atlanta lenders asking for voluminous information on CRA activities and lending activities.

"They ultimately lost a lot of this information and had to come back and ask for it again," Mackle noted.

Justice made many more requests for information and lengthy visits to Decatur over the next three years. In 1991 it microfilmed 6,000 loan files. "You should have seen what our loan files looked like after they left," said Mackle.

The DOJ hired an econometrician to feed the documents into an econometric model that analyzed the bank's lending decisions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Decatur Federal: "We Did Not Believe We Were a Target." (Department of Justice Case against Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Association, Decatur, Georgia)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?