Media Analysis: The Price of Antisocial Behaviour

Marketing, March 28, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Media Analysis: The Price of Antisocial Behaviour


Brands that ignore a crackdown on unlawful outdoor ads will risk their reputation and a hefty legal bill.

Gateshead Council's successful prosecution last week of Newcastle agency Gorilla Media for placing illegal roadside signage on AdVans for brands including the government-backed Adult Learning Grants initiative has put the issue of rogue advertising firmly back in the spotlight.

Industry leaders claim the problem is diminishing, but the government's setting up of a central database last week to empower councils to prosecute repeat offenders suggests otherwise.

With social responsibility at the top of the business agenda, illicit outdoor media will be a concern to marketers wanting to avoid the tag of corporate vandalism.

Brands running ads on lampposts or illegal hoardings certainly need to consider their actions more carefully, according to Glen Wilson, deputy managing director at Posterscope.

'These companies are effectively stealing advertising space,' he says. 'Advertisers using these firms are supporting these practices and marketers need to realise that there is a reason why these campaigns are being offered so cheaply.'

The true cost of such activity is passed on to consumers through their council tax, as their local authority is faced with the task of keeping the streets clean. Camden Council estimates that in 2004 it spent pounds 250,000 on removing flyposters. Gateshead Council says residents regularly complain about illegal ads, which it believes have a 'negative effect on the urban environment'.

The responsibility lies with marketers to ensure they are using a reputable and well-resourced agency, says Chris O'Donnell, business development director at Kinetic. 'There are always people operating on the dark side of any medium, but it is imperative that agencies know the law,' he adds.

In relation to the latter point, Camden Council claims that rogue companies will often tell advertisers that they have 48 hours to remove a poster after they are contacted by the authorities, when in fact the timing of the offence is taken to be the point at which the ad was put up.

In general, bigger companies such as Guardian Newspapers and Sony BMG have ceased flyposting, but vigilance is still required when it comes to smaller brands, according to Camden Council's enforcement officer. 'Most flyposters are well aware that what they are doing is illegal, and we hold both the advertiser and flyposter responsible,' he says.

Reputable agencies agree there is a moral argument against illegal sites, but there are also commercial implications. There is no guarantee, for example, that the vast majority of a flyposting campaign will not end up in the bin.

Flyposting also risks negative brand connotations; Bristol residents were up in arms when work by renowned graffiti artist Banksy was removed, but an ad for a sale at a sofa showroom would be unlikely to evoke the same passionate defence.

A more serious danger, particularly in relation to illegal roadside advertising, is a costly lawsuit. Many agencies will have liability insurance, but marketers using smaller outfits could leave themselves wide open.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Media Analysis: The Price of Antisocial Behaviour
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?