Banning Select Signs in Windows of Private Homes Is Unconstitutional; U. S. Supreme Court Says Missouri Ordinance Violates a Homeowner's Free-Speech Rights

By Hernandez, Debra Gersh | Editor & Publisher, July 16, 1994 | Go to article overview

Banning Select Signs in Windows of Private Homes Is Unconstitutional; U. S. Supreme Court Says Missouri Ordinance Violates a Homeowner's Free-Speech Rights


Hernandez, Debra Gersh, Editor & Publisher


A CITY ORDINANCE banning signs in the windows of private homes is violative of First Amendment freespeech rights, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

"A special respect for individual liberty in the home has long been part of our culture and our law ... and that principle has special resonance when the government seeks to constrain a person's ability to speak there," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the unanimous court.

The case stems from a sign -- originally placed on the lawn and later moved to the window -- at the Laude, Mo., home of Margaret Gilleo. The sign protested the government's thenpending action in the Persian Gulf war.

Gilleo was accused of violating a city ordinance against posting certain signs. The ordinance contained a number of exemptions, such as "for sale" and "for rent" signs, as well as those at schools and churches and other specific locations.

Both the U.S. District Court and the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Gilleo.

"While signs are a form of expression protected by the Free Speech Clause, they pose distinctive problems that are subject to municipalities' police powers," Stevens wrote. "Unlike oral speech, signs take up space and may obstruct views, distract motorists, displace alternative use for land, and pose other problems that legitimately call for regulation."

However, the Court found that the exemptions allowed by the city actually can make the regulation under-inclusive.

"Thus, an exemption from an otherwise permissible regulation of speech may represent a governmental 'attempt to give one side of a debatable public question an advantage in expressing its views to the people,'" Stevens wrote, quoting from a 1978 Supreme Court decision.

In addition, Stevens noted, "Exemptions from an otherwise legitimate regulation of a medium of speech may be noteworthy for a reason quite apart from the risks of viewpoint and content discrimination: they may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place....

"Ladue has not imposed a flat ban on signs because it has determined that at least some of them are too vital to be banned," he added.

The prohibition further closes off "a venerable means of communication that is both unique and important. It has totally foreclosed that medium to political, religious, or personal messages."

Stevens commented that, "Although prohibitions foreclosing entire media may be completely free of content or viewpoint discrimination, the danger they pose to the freedom of speech is readily apparent -- by eliminating a common means of speaking, such measures can suppress too much speech."

The city argued that the ban is simply a "time, place or manner" restriction because residents can convey their ideas through other means, but Stevens pointed out that alternative means of expression, such as handbills, are not adequate substitutes.

"Displaying a sign from one's own residence often carries a message quite distinct from placing the same sign somewhere else, or conveying the same text or picture by other means," the Court decided.

Further, Stevens wrote, "Residential signs are an unusually cheap and convenient form of communication.... Even for the affluent, the added costs in money or time of taking out a newspaper advertisement, handing out leaflets on the street, or standing in front of one's house with a hand-held sign may make the difference between participating and not participating in some public debate.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Banning Select Signs in Windows of Private Homes Is Unconstitutional; U. S. Supreme Court Says Missouri Ordinance Violates a Homeowner's Free-Speech Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.