Election Analysis through the Looking Glass: Political Ideology Is More Important Than Religion When It Comes to Voting

By Russonello, John; Agiesta, Jennifer | Conscience, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview

Election Analysis through the Looking Glass: Political Ideology Is More Important Than Religion When It Comes to Voting


Russonello, John, Agiesta, Jennifer, Conscience


DEMOCRATS POISED TO TAKE control of Congress in January heard claims by religious progressives that the 2006 elections had been strongly influenced by religious organizing on the center-left. They would be wise to examine such claims carefully. Writing a post-election analysis is like having a magic looking glass: It allows you to see whatever conclusion you desire in the results.

These progressive religionists who gaze into the looking glass and see moral shifts are using an "exit poll" by John Zogby as proof that many evangelicals, Catholics and frequent churchgoers have replaced abortion and gay rights with Iraq, the economy and economic justice on their moral agendas. Ah, if it were really that simple.

This interpretation is an excellent example of the danger of election analysts' claims to know what impact "morals" have on the electorate. Morals vary depending on the person. You do not really know what someone considers a moral issue and what is simply a priority for government to address unless you ask. Zogby's poll never asked. He gave voters a list of issues he had conveniently labeled as moral, such as the war in Iraq, abortion, stem cell research and same-sex marriage, and asked people to choose the most important from among them. How can we--or Zogby--know that these are the most important moral issues to voters?

The Zogby "exit poll," conducted for the group Faith in Public Life, was in fact not an exit poll. Instead, it was a post-election survey of self-selected Zogby Interactive panel members. The voters were not randomly selected, and none of the participants were interviewed as they left the polls. The poll is representative only of those who have Internet access, signed up for Zogby's panel, claim to have voted and chose to take the survey.

Instead of using bad data to justify a hoped-for outcome, progressive religious people should take a clear-eyed look at the election and keep a few points in mind.

First, not everything is a moral issue. Calling an issue moral makes it a loaded term, carrying different meanings, depending on the audience. For some, moral issues mean abortion and gay rights; others think of jobs and affordable health care. For some, being moral is simply being a fundamentalist Christian; for others, it is following the Constitution. Beware of claims about what issues are moral.

Second, pay close attention to the Catholic vote. In every presidential election in the last 30 years, the candidate that won the Catholic vote also won the popular vote.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Election Analysis through the Looking Glass: Political Ideology Is More Important Than Religion When It Comes to Voting
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.