Stories of Politics and Policy: Florida's Higher Education Governance Reorganization

By Mills, Michael R. | Journal of Higher Education, March-April 2007 | Go to article overview

Stories of Politics and Policy: Florida's Higher Education Governance Reorganization


Mills, Michael R., Journal of Higher Education


It might be best to consider the organization of state-level systems of higher education in the United States as a continuing experiment. Scholars who recount the development of public higher education in the states generally agree that structures to increase control of state systems grew along with public higher education after World War II. Yet, even then, the structures took several different forms. Further, specific details of the division of authority and responsibilities and the mechanics of operation differed from one state to the next, and in many states the structure of governance became the occasional center of debate and reform. More recently, the suggestion is that new structures are needed to cope with new environmental conditions that include constricted state resources, globalization, increasing competition from for-profit education providers, the rapid development of information technology, and the quest for market orientation and "customer-centered" operations. However, states seem to stagger in different directions; some opt for more centralized organizations while others attempt to decentralize their systems. Changes in state governance structures seem more likely to reflect the unique contexts of the history and the current pressures of each state and may well be the result of the vagaries of the political processes in each state (Leslie & Novak, 2003).

Thus, detailed studies of specific state's governance changes can make important contributions to our explanations and understandings of how and why changes occur. This study specifically examines recent changes in the structure of state-level governance for universities in Florida. From 2000 to 2002, the state developed and enacted a new arrangement that placed all education, from kindergarten to graduate school, in one system under the Florida Board of Education. The sector experiencing the greatest change in the process was the State University System, in which the single governing board, the Board of Regents, was replaced with boards of trustees at each of the universities. The change and the process by which it occurred were widely reported and received national attention, in large part because observers considered the proposed structure innovative, particularly when attempted at the scale of a state as large as Florida. Further, the political aspects of the change were highlighted, perhaps obscuring other components of and rationales for the changes undertaken. This study investigates why the reorganization took place and examines three distinct narratives that explain the processes of and the reasons for the structural changes. None of the three narratives presents a complete description and rationale for the governance change, but together they suggest a broad set of intentions and influences that surround higher education structural change as it rose to the forefront of the public policy agenda.

Literature

Three specific sets of literature help set the framework for examining the recent governance change in Florida higher education. One is literature on state structures in higher education; another is literature on narrative and stories in policy making; the third is current literature on theories of punctuated policy change and the related matter of policy agenda setting.

State Structures in Higher Education

The evolution of state public higher education systems has been marked by several decades of enormous growth in the mid-twentieth century. The management of that growth led to the need for coordination of the development of institutions as well as to mechanisms to protect higher education from inappropriate political interference (Berdahl, 1971; Glenny, 1959). However, multiple governance patterns persisted over time, with the most common categorization scheme distinguishing (a) statewide governing boards responsible for all operations in public institutions, (b) statewide coordinating boards providing central oversight to multiple institutional governing boards, and (c) state planning boards with little authority for statewide coordination (McGuinness, 1999).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Stories of Politics and Policy: Florida's Higher Education Governance Reorganization
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.