A Turbulent Reputation: Michael Staunton Considers How Thomas Becket, a Controversial Figure Even in His Own Lifetime and Ever since, Was Described by His Earliest Biographers

By Staunton, Michael | History Today, April 2007 | Go to article overview

A Turbulent Reputation: Michael Staunton Considers How Thomas Becket, a Controversial Figure Even in His Own Lifetime and Ever since, Was Described by His Earliest Biographers


Staunton, Michael, History Today


IN 2001 THOMAS BECKET (1120?-70) was named by the Daily Mail as one of history's 100 'Great Britons'. Four years later he came runner-up to Jack the Ripper in a BBC History magazine poll of 'Worst Britons'. Such a disparity of opinion is nothing new. Becket's brutal murder in Canterbury Cathedral in December 1170 unleashed an outpouring of grief and outrage which quickly developed into an extraordinarily successful and dynamic cult of St Thomas. But even as crowds flocked to his tomb, hailing him as the greatest saint of his age, or even the greatest in Christian history, criticism lingered. Not everyone had revised their impression of Becket as an arrogant troublemaker whose life had shown little evidence of sanctity and whose actions had been harmful not only to the King but to the interests of the Church he claimed to represent. In 1538, Henry VIII ordered the destruction of Canterbury's shrine to their martyr, and since then opinion on Thomas has often divided along Catholic/Protestant lines. But criticism and support for Becket have not always come from predictable quarters, or for the reasons one might expect. He has been championed by kings and hated by churchmen, and criticism has not only been acknowledged by his supporters, but employed as part of the construction of his sanctity.

The man who lay dead on the floor of Canterbury Cathedral on December 29th, 1170, was, according to his murderers, a 'traitor to the king and the kingdom'. After six years of exile in France he had returned to England with the goodwill of Henry II, only to disturb the peace, as he had done so many times before. It was the King's furious outburst against his Archbishop that had incited the four knights to set out for Canterbury, but his enemies were by no means confined to the secular world. Henry's rage had been sparked by a visit from the archbishop of York and the bishops of London and Salisbury, exasperated by Becket's decision to excommunicate or suspend them from office for crowning the King's son in his absence. These were long-standing enemies who had frequently clashed with their archbishop.

After his murder, their criticisms of Thomas were largely silenced, but there survives an eloquent and lacerating critique of Becket from the pen of one, Gilbert Foliot, bishop of London. Gilbert was everything that Becket was not: an austere Cluniac monk from a noble family, and a distinguished scholar. Passed over for the position of Archbishop of Canterbury in 1162 in favour of Becket, his views on the dispute are coloured by bitterness, and his letter to Thomas of 1166, Multiplicem nobis, in which he reviewed the archbishop's career, stands as a damning verdict on Becket's policies and an indictment of the man himself.

'It is difficult', writes Gilbert, 'for things begun with bad beginnings to be carried through to a good conclusion'. For an archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas's beginnings were certainly unorthodox. The son of a London merchant, his training had been first as clerk to a city accountant, then as clerk to Archbishop Theobald of Canterbury, before serving the King as royal chancellor for seven-and-a-half years. He showed no great intellectual distinction, and he did not become a priest until the day before his consecration as archbishop on June 3rd, 1162. Above all, his behaviour as chancellor was far from what might have been expected of a future archbishop. His love of feasting, hunting and display are well attested. Once he led an embassy to Paris accompanied by hundreds of attendants, eight wagons carrying silver dishes, changes of clothing and large quantities of ale, each wagon accompanied by a fierce dog and drawn by five horses, and on top of each horse a monkey. On another occasion he led an army of thousands into battle on the Norman frontier against the French, and himself unseated a famous knight from his charger. He was also a loyal servant and close friend of the King, and this fact at once makes more sense of his appointment and also left it open to criticism, making it appear as uncanonical and blatantly royalist. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Turbulent Reputation: Michael Staunton Considers How Thomas Becket, a Controversial Figure Even in His Own Lifetime and Ever since, Was Described by His Earliest Biographers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.