Labour's Drugs Failure; Ten-Year 'War' Has Achieved Nothing but Lower Street Prices, Say Experts

Daily Mail (London), April 19, 2007 | Go to article overview

Labour's Drugs Failure; Ten-Year 'War' Has Achieved Nothing but Lower Street Prices, Say Experts


Byline: STEVE DOUGHTY

A DECADE of Labour's war on drugs has done nothing to curb the misery and crime caused by abuse, a research group declared yesterday.

Propaganda campaigns, law enforcement and imprisonment for drug dealers have had no effect on levels of drug use, it said.

Police activity against drug markets and seizures of smuggled drugs have resulted only in lower street prices.

The scathing criticism came in a report by the UK Drug Policy Commission, an independently funded group which intends to press the Government to try harder to tackle huge levels of damage caused by drug users.

It said that one in four people in their late 20s have tried a hard drug such as heroin or cocaine at least once; that nearly half of all young people have used cannabis; and that the drug addiction rate in Britain is more than twice the levels of France, Germany, Sweden or Holland.

The report added that there is a drugs market worth an estimated [pounds sterling]5billion a year, that the cost of drug-related crime is thought to be [pounds sterling]13billion, and that one in five of all people arrested for crime are dependent on heroin.

The verdict comes at a time of growing pressure on the Government for change in the drugs laws that were last radically overhauled more than 35 years ago.

Ministers are due to consider the effects of Labour's ten-year drugs programme - which began bullishly-with the 'war on drugs' in 1998 - next year.

Tony Blair's war on drugs appeared to be reversed spectacularly in 2001 when then Home Secretary David Blunkett announced the reclassification of cannabis, a move which downgraded the criminal status of the drug so that users are unlikely to be arrested.

The chairman of the new Commission, Dame Ruth Runciman, was one of the key figures behind the cannabis reclassification.

She said yesterday: 'We are an independent organisation that will provide objective analysis of drug policy.

The debate on drugs is often sensationalised and polarised. Our mission is to improve political and public understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of policies for tackling drug misuse.' Yesterday's report praised 'harm reduction' policies - which broadly accept the use of drugs and attempt to cut the damage addicts cause - while dismissing the effects of enforcement law and imprisonment.

It said: 'Government policies have only limited impact on rates of drug use itself. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Labour's Drugs Failure; Ten-Year 'War' Has Achieved Nothing but Lower Street Prices, Say Experts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.