Pinchot, Property Rights, and Western Water: A Reply to Gregory Hobbs

By Blumm, Michael C. | Environmental Law, July 1994 | Go to article overview

Pinchot, Property Rights, and Western Water: A Reply to Gregory Hobbs


Blumm, Michael C., Environmental Law


At the risk of extending this already prolonged debate, I want to make three brief points in reply to Greg Hobbs' response to my response to his diatribe on the Long's Peak report.(1) First, Hobbs claims that my assertion that Gifford Pinchot's multiple use paradigm "bears little or no resemblance to how water is allocated in the West"(2) is "incredibly unsupported," and that adherence to the recommendations contained in the Long's Peak report "would sacrifice the public interest multi-use paradigm which was the birthright of progressive conservationism."(3) Hobbs is able to set the Long's Peak report against Pinchot's progressive conservation ideal only by mischaracterizing the report's recommendations, which I pointed out earlier.(4) Here, I want to emphasize that Hobbs mischaracterizes not only the Long's Peak recommendations but Pinchot's brand of conservation as well.

Pinchot's call for multiple use was not simply a call for development of water resources, it was a call for centralized, federal regulation of waterways. Hobbs notes that Pinchot was opposed to monopolies.(5) Antimonopoly to a progressive conservationist like Pinchot meant federal control to prevent concentrations of wealth. Pinchot himself equated effective antimonopoly policies with federal control:

[Conservation policy must] see to it that the rights of the people to govern themselves shall not be controlled by great monopolies through their power over natural resources.

Two of the principal ways in which lack of Conservation works out in damage to the general welfare are: (A) by destruction of forests, erosion of soils, injury of waterways, and waste of nonrenewable resources. Here is a strong reason for Government control. (B) by monopoly of natural and human resources, their products and application....

Monopoly on the loose is a source of many of the economic, political, and social evils which afflict the sons of men. Its abolition or regulation is an inseparable part of Conservation policy.(6)

As a result of sentiments like these, Pinchot supported the Inland Waterways Commission's 1908 call for centralized, national water planning, limited-term water power licenses, and "above all" (Pinchot's words) retention of federal title to all power sites.(7) Pinchot's conservation paradigm of basinwide, scientific planning by nonpolitical experts, limited private rights, and public ownership of resources has little in common with Western water law, which is largely a private rights system premised on no scientific government planning. Western water law's ideological ancestor is the law of the mining camps or the law of wild animals, not Pinchot's progressive conservation, which was actually a reaction against the resource monopolization that accompanied such private rights allocation systems. Hobbs' attempt to align his defense of Western water allocation with Pinchot is premised on a complete misunderstanding of the motivating forces of progressive conservation.(8)

The second point I wish to make concerns Hobbs' acknowledgment that nuisance law imposes limits on water rights.(9) Thus, property rights in water are no different than property rights in land; both are constrained by the notion that a rights holder cannot unreasonably interfere with the rights of another (private nuisance) or with the rights of the public (public nuisance).(10) In this respect, both land and water rights are contingent and flexible, able to accommodate the felt necessities of the day. Western water law's prohibition against waste is a prime example of proscribed nuisance-like behavior. Other nuisance-like activities include the pollution of waterbodies and the eradication of wildlife species. As Professor Sax has pointed out, property rights to use water do not include a compensable right to pollute water or to destroy water-dependent species.(11)

It may be argued in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Lucas v. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Pinchot, Property Rights, and Western Water: A Reply to Gregory Hobbs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.