The Double Writing of Les Mots: Sartre's Words as Performative Philosophy

By Whitmire, John F., Jr. | Sartre Studies International, December 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Double Writing of Les Mots: Sartre's Words as Performative Philosophy

Whitmire, John F., Jr., Sartre Studies International

ABSTRACT: Sartre's Les Mots has given rise to widely divergent competing readings in the philosophical literature, which tend to view it either as a simple continuation of his earlier, radical libertarianism, or as part of an alleged wholesale renunciation of the position we find in his early texts. I argue that most of these readings ignore the very real tensions in Words between the freedom of consciousness and the weight of circumstances. I further argue that Les Mots is a performative text whose double writing (originally composed 1954-1957; rewritten 1963) demonstrates for us that, whereas we cannot simply renounce our past and the original meanings mediated to us in childhood through our families, we do have the power to take it up in ways that skew those meanings in somewhat different directions. No matter what we do, however, the blurred outlines of those original meanings will always remain.

KEYWORDS: Sartre, Les Mots, words, autobiography, self, subject, conversion, palimpsest, performative.


Hugo: I have no gift for anything.

Hoederer: You have a gift for writing.

Hugo: For writing! Words! Always words!

(Dirty Hands, tr. Lionel Abel) (1)

It is generally recognized that there is in Sartre's thought a significant shift away from his earlier emphasis on radical freedom in Being and Nothingness, The Transcendence of the Ego, and the phenomenological studies of imagination, in the later Critique of Dialectical Reason and its introduction, translated as Search for a Method. Indeed, by the time one reaches The Idiot of the Family, the multi-volume study of Flaubert, very little seems to remain of the robust sense of freedom in those early works. Sartre himself characterizes the matter thus in 1974: freedom is "the small movement which makes of a totally conditioned being someone who does not render back completely what his conditioning has given him ... the small margin in an operation whereby an interiorization re-exteriorizes itself in an act." (2) In the same interview, he claims that "L'Etre et Le Neant traced an interior experience, without any coordination with the exterior experience of a petty-bourgeois intellectual." (3)

What one does not find a great deal of in the secondary literature, however, is reflection on the place Sartre's own autobiographical work, Les Mots, occupies in this movement. (4) While there have certainly been significant critical studies on important philosophical and textual issues conducted by literary critical theorists, (5) the shelf space devoted to Words among philosophers is notably small.

Rivca and Haim Gordon sum up the scholarly situation with respect to Words in a particularly vitriolic way in a 1992 essay, (6) noting that most discussions of the text occur in a literary-critical, "non-philosophical" context. Although they grant that Hugh Silverman (among a very few others) traces the links between Les Mots and the Critique, they contend (7) that there is no serious work systematically linking Words with Being and Nothingness, in English or in French, up to the date of publication of their own work. They go on to excoriate "Robert Champigny's rambling essay 'Sartre on Sartre'" as a typical example of the "cunning musing on Sartre's various views and personal development" that takes place in the "non-philosophical" literature, and to the exclusion of a "systematic" or "wise" linkage of Words and the more theoretical works. (8)

While I do not share their conviction as to the lack of value of the literary critical studies, an evaluation of the philosophical literature published since 1992 makes it clear that virtually the same situation obtains now as Gordon and Gordon described over 10 years ago. Even the impressive collection of studies of Les Mots by Michel Contat and others (9) is primarily devoted to literary critical analyses of the text, by which I mean analyses of style, cultural allusions and literary references in the work, and so forth.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Double Writing of Les Mots: Sartre's Words as Performative Philosophy


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?