College Students with Learning Disabilities (SWLD) and Their Responses to Teacher Power

By Worley, David W.; Cornett-DeVito, Myrna M. | Communication Studies, March 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

College Students with Learning Disabilities (SWLD) and Their Responses to Teacher Power


Worley, David W., Cornett-DeVito, Myrna M., Communication Studies


Introduction

Researchers have given considerable attention to the role of power in the classroom. Specifically, since power is the potential or ability to influence the behavior of others (Barraclough & Stewart 1992), researchers have considered both teachers and students use of influence in the classroom. Our literature review centers, then, on these two foci. First, we consider the seven germinal studies of power in the classroom. Thereafter, we review studies related to this series and finally review the literature regarding student power.

Teacher Power

Power in the Classroom Studies

McCroskey, Richmond, and colleagues (1983) began a series of studies focused on teacher and student perceptions of power and how these perceptions impact learning. These studies (McCroskey & Richmond, 1983; Richmond & McCroskey, 1984) employed the work of French and Raven's (1968) typology of power and linked power with cognitive and affective learning. Other studies (Kearney, Plax, Richmond & McCroskey, 1984; McCroskey, Richmond, Plax & Kearney, 1985; Plax, Kearney, McCroskey, & Richmond, 1986; Richmond, McCroskey, Kearney, & Plax, 1987) focused on the development and use of behavior alteration techniques (BATs) and behavior alternation messages (BAMs).

Other Related Studies: Critique and Extension

Critique

This series of studies spawned other studies, including Sprague's (1990, 1992a, 1992b, 1993) critical critique of the epistemology and methodology represented in instructional communication literature, in general, and the "power studies", in particular, along with Rodriquez and Cai's (1994) subsequent response to Sprague. A series of other authors also engaged this debate (see Burleson, Wilson, Waltman, Goering, Ely, & Whaley, 1988; Kearney & Plax, 1997; Plax, Kearney, & Sorensen, 1990; Sorensen, Plax, & Kearney, 1989; Waltman & Burleson, 1997a, 1997b).

Additionally, Simonds (1995, 1997) suggested a transactional, negotiated model of classroom power. She argued that any challenge behavior served as an opportunity to communicate expectations more clearly, rather than engage in conflict.

Extension

These seven studies then generated additional research focused on a variety of issues related to power in the classroom, which cluster around two different themes. First, Plax, Kearney, and Tucker (1986) and Roach (1991) focused on the level of teacher experience and power. Second, a series of studies looked at other variables and teacher power including teacher satisfaction (Plax, Kearney, & Downs, 1986), evaluators' perceptions of the teachers' use of power (Allen & Edwards, 1988), the use of power at given points in a semester (Roach, 1994), and culture and power (Lu, 1997).

Student Power

To this point, we have reviewed literature that focuses on the teacher's use of power. However, students also possess and employ power, often thought of as student resistance, which Burroughs, Kearney, and Plax (1989) note can be either constructive or destructive.

Kearney and Plax (1992) summarize the student power literature very well by noting "three major propositions" (p. 87):

   (1) College students do resist. (2) Students rely on a diversity of
   techniques to resist teacher influence attempts. (3) Both the
   decision to resist and the strategies students select depend on
   the attributions they make. (p. 87)

However, additional studies have added insight related to these three propositions, which focus on students as active agents of persuasion who seek compliance, as well as resist compliance.

Student Compliance-Resistance

First, students do, indeed, resist. This resistance results in different types of messages (Burroughs et a1., 1989) and is related to teacher immediacy (Kearney, Plax, Smith, & Sorensen, 1988; Kearney, Plax, & Burroughs, 1991; Kearney, Plax, Hays, & Ivey, 1991).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

College Students with Learning Disabilities (SWLD) and Their Responses to Teacher Power
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?