Forensic Archaeology in Britain

By Hunter, J. R.; Heron, C. et al. | Antiquity, December 1994 | Go to article overview

Forensic Archaeology in Britain


Hunter, J. R., Heron, C., Janaway, R. C., Martin, A. L., Pollard, A. M., Roberts, C. A., Antiquity


Forensic archaeology is a relatively recent development in the UK but has already shown its worth on a number of scenes of crime; it has a particular role to play in the location and recovery of buried remains, notably in homicide investigations. This paper explores the overlap between archaeology and criminal investigation and considers areas of mutual interest, experience and potential.

Background

In December 1962 William Jennings beat to death his 3-year-old son Stephen at their home in West Yorkshire. He wrapped the body in a sack, carried it to the edge of woodland and laid it against the base of a drystone wall. Having covered it with stones he went home and later reported the boy missing. Despite an intensive search the following winter the boy's fate was unknown, until in 1988 his remains were partially exposed by a dog. They were subsequently excavated and recorded by an integrated team which included specialists in archaeology, forensic science and forensic pathology, as well as senior detectives and a scene of crime unit. The recovery of the boy's remains and surviving clothing marked an important stage in the application of archaeological techniques in forensic contexts in Britain. When William Jennings was convicted of murder, his trial set a precedent for the use of archaeological evidence in a British court.

Archaeological methodologies have been successfully applied in a number of investigations, including the Moors Murders enquiry of 1986. In other investigations, however, it has been conspicuously absent: in the 1953 murders at Rillington Place; in the 1983 Nilsen murders at Muswell Hill; and in a well publicized enquiry centred on Cromwell Street, Gloucester in 1994 -- all reminiscent of earlier American experiences in which surface skeletons were 'collected with a garden rake and buried bodies with a backhoe' (Morse et al. 1984: 53).

Forensic archaeology, a distinctive area of study which conjoins archaeology and criminal investigation and a relatively recent development in the UK (see Boddington et al. 1987), has been the subject of some research (Martin 1991) and comment (Davis 1992). In the US forensic archaeology is both better grounded and further advanced with a useful volume of case studies for comparison; the annual number of homicides (20,000) is much greater than in the UK (around 450 according to Home Office figures), and the demand for archaeological support proportionally higher. Only approximately one murder in fifty involves burial. Much early American expertise originated from within the discipline of physical anthropology whose forensic application has been well documented in papers (e.g. Snow 1982; Iscan 1988). Most feature landmark identification cases, notably Dwight's work in the Parkman murder of 1849 and Dorsey's identification of the remains of Louise Luetgert in the vats of her husband's Chicago sausage factory in 1897 (Stewart 1978). Britain's best recorded contribution occurred some 40 years later when Buck Ruxton, a Lancaster GP, dismembered his wife and housekeeper before (unsuccessfully) removing their identifying features and dumping their remains over a bridge (Glaister & Brash 1937). The Second World War, Korean and Vietnam Wars, whilst providing skeletal material on which methods of identification were later based, created a new need for victim identification, and the skills of biological anthropologists subsequently became engraved in textbooks (e.g. Krogman 1962; Stewart 1979). Snow notes the wider acceptance of the term 'forensic anthropology' in US literature of that time (1982: 107), subsequently reinforced by its application to the Chicago DC-10 disaster of 1979 and in attempts to identify the remains of Josef Mengele and Mozart.

Much of the relevant US literature, from a physical anthropological base, has come to notice the importance of field recovery and the application of archaeological techniques (e.g. Snow 1982: 117; Sigler-Eisenberg 1985). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Forensic Archaeology in Britain
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.