Using Radiocarbon: An Update

By Bowman, Sheridan | Antiquity, December 1994 | Go to article overview

Using Radiocarbon: An Update


Bowman, Sheridan, Antiquity


A note in the 1990 ANTIQUITY volume dealt with four issues crucial to the successful use of radiocarbon in archaeology (Bowman & Balaam 1990): selection and characterization of material and context; determination of the radiocarbon result and error term; interpretation and publication; and strategic resourcing. Since then much has been published, particularly on quality control of radiocarbon measurements ('determination'), and on the calibration of radiocarbon results ('interpretation'). Here is an update.

Determination -- accuracy and precision

Discussion of laboratory accuracy and precision in radiocarbon dating, dull for reader and writer alike, is seemingly well rehearsed. Nevertheless, the difference between these two types of error is central to any understanding of quality control in radiocarbon dating, and to any evaluation by the user of advice on how to use error terms. Accuracy determines how close the experimental result is to the true value, and precision determines the closeness of replicate measurements to each other: accurate results can be imprecise and vice versa (see, for example, Bowman 1990: figure 15). The error quoted by a laboratory is, in theory, the precision (the uncertainty due to random variability); but most radiocarbon laboratories estimate their precision rather than determine it by replication because of the resources involved in repeating measurements. In estimating there is the danger that not all potential sources of random error are included.

A proposed quality assurance protocol for radiocarbon (Long & Kalin 1990) covers all aspects of the dating procedure from documentation of samples received to issue of results, but it may not be obvious to the user whether a radiocarbon laboratory is providing quality control as far as accuracy and precision are concerned. Any laboratory should be able to provide information on its accuracy, either as evaluated in an intercomparison study with other laboratories or against known age samples. Much the most relevant samples of known age for archaeological applications of radiocarbon are dendrochronologically dated tree-rings from the same sequence as used for one of the high-precision calibration curves: laboratory accuracy demonstrated with such known age samples means users can be confident that their radiocarbon results can be calibrated against accepted curves. Laboratory participation in an intercomparison, on the other hand, is 'blind', i.e. the laboratory does not know the age of the samples before it submits its results for scrutiny. Furthermore, with the publication of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) intercomparison (Rozanski 1991) and Third International Radiocarbon Intercomparison ('TIRI', Scott et al. forthcoming) the results are no longer anonymous: users will be able to see for themselves how well participating laboratories fared relative to the consensus results from these studies. Anonymity, not unnaturally, suggested that laboratories had something to hide, but it also, perhaps surprisingly, provided a potential safeguard of benefit to the user. A laboratory on finding it has a systematic error (i.e. that it is producing inaccurate results) can, and should, investigate and rectify the problem. Its position on a 'league table' at any given time is therefore not immutable, and a correction made to the results of that laboratory produced at another time may well introduce, rather than remove, an error. Only the laboratory itself can tell the user whether or not it has, or has had, a systematic bias, and when.

This is not to say that intercomparison studies are not useful -- they are -- but largely to provide laboratories with independent checks of in-house procedures and, in the future, may well be required procedures whereby laboratories can be 'quality certified' to enable them to tender at least for government funded contracts. They also give the user a clear statement that the laboratory is committed to quality control: participation in an intercomparison study is no small use of limited resources.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using Radiocarbon: An Update
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.