Criminology, Crime and Politics before and after 9/11

By Hogg, Russell | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, April 2007 | Go to article overview

Criminology, Crime and Politics before and after 9/11


Hogg, Russell, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology


Criminologists have mostly followed the criminal law in adopting an apolitical concept of crime. They paid limited attention to both political crime and the political power to criminalise. The article traces efforts to redress this since the 1960s. It nevertheless remained a minority concern, mostly of critical criminology. Yet crime has been politicised in various ways by other developments, also examined in the article. The events of 9/11 have crowned the emergence of crime as a strategic security issue posing a challenge to criminology to engage with politically inspired crime and its control.

**********

The phenomenon of political crime has been neglected in western criminology, attracting the attention of only a relative handful of scholars. From the 1960s a small number of critical researchers sought to broaden the horizons of criminology, exploring the manner in which much deviant behaviour embodied, however inchoately, elements of protest against the prevailing social, moral and political order. Yet other critical scholars switched the focus altogether by concentrating on state crime. The impact of this work on mainstream criminology, however, remained limited and probably diminished as the optimistic climate of radical protest in the 1960s and 1970s gave way to the neo-conservative chill of the Thatcher/Reagan years, the implosion of Soviet communism and the apparent global triumph of western capitalism. Many pioneers of critical criminology came in from the cold, renounced any lingering romanticism concerning the protopolitical character of crime and embraced a new realism. Other scholars in this period worked away in areas like terrorism studies, but usually as a subfield of strategic studies, international relations or political science with few if any links to criminology.

With the attacks on New York and Washington on 11 September 2001, political violence was suddenly, unsurprisingly, thrust into the public, political and policy limelight. The general academic community in Australia has been criticised, rightly or wrongly, for failing to rise to the intellectual challenges posed by global terrorism (see for example the exchange conducted in the pages of The Australian's Higher Education supplement in September 2006). In a provocative article, Bendle (2006) commented on the paucity of academic research and analysis in Australia and the poverty of the work that had been done. His chief complaint was that those who had bothered to enter the debate at all had done so only to further rehearse tired, politically inspired research agendas on race, class and sex. Responding to the criticism several academics suggested that by limiting his survey to general social science and humanities journals Bendle had simply looked in the wrong place for current work on terrorism. They pointed to a burgeoning field of terrorism studies with its own research institutes, journals, conferences, academic programs, and no doubt an assured flow of research funds (see The Australian Higher Education, September 13, 2006, pp. 28-29).

One group of scholars has been far from silent. Legal academics and many of their practitioner colleagues are deeply, and understandably, concerned about the fate of the rule of law and liberal democratic institutions in the 'war on terror'. Legal scrutiny of new counter-terrorist measures, while absolutely necessary, is largely defensive. It is commonly derided by politicians and media commentators as simply out of touch with the reality of terrorist threats and everyday fears. Its essentially normative character is prey to empirical claims that terrorist threats are novel and exceptional.

What of criminology though? It too has had its academic exchanges and disagreements over the scale and quality of criminological scholarship devoted to terrorism before and since 9/11 (see e.g., Deflem, 2005; Harem, 2005). I will consider some of the implications for criminology of the advent of global terrorism and the 'war on terror' in the final part of this article. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Criminology, Crime and Politics before and after 9/11
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.