Beyond the Gun-Control Debate: This Reflection on the Virginia Tech Massacre Looks beyond the Gun Debate to the Importance of Cultural Morality in Reducing Senseless Crimes of Violence

Williamsen, Kart, The New American

The toll of the Virginia Tech shooting was 33 human beings dead and dozens of others injured. The loss of so many innocent youths to a madman was heart-rending. Making matters worse, if that's possible, was the manner of their deaths. Some were found in defensive positions, instinctively trying to ward off bullets with their bare hands.

I reflected long about what could have been done to prevent this useless carnage and pain. As I reflected, I listened to news commentators such as Charles Gibson, Katie Couric, and Brian Ross ask questions about whether lax gun-control laws were to blame for this shooting. Each of them strongly implied that new gun-control laws are the answer.

"But," I thought at the risk of offending those media luminaries, "where they're placing the blame for this violence is at odds with the respondents of an April ABC News poll, who blamed popular culture."

When asked in that April poll to choose a "primary cause of gun violence, far more Americans blamed the effects of popular culture (40 percent) or the way parents raise their children (35 percent) than the availability of guns (18 percent). In no population does more than about a fourth cite the availability of guns as the chief cause of violence."

What if popular culture is to blame--or more specifically, what if a lack of cultural morality is to blame? If the poll respondents are on to something and guns are not to blame, it needs to be asked, "Can a correlation be shown between cultural morals and rates of violent crime--especially gun crime?" Let us see.

Held Up High

Three of the most important countries held up to prove that gun-control measures work are Japan, England, and Australia. These countries' restrictive laws against civilians owning guns, which make owning a gun for defensive purposes either difficult or nearly impossible, are credited with producing much lower rates of gun deaths in those countries than in America. Assuming the lower death rates are true, it must only be learned whether the lower reported deaths are owing to gun control or culture.

The results of my perusal of the research on this topic were conclusive: cultural morality is hands-down a more reliable factor for predicting violence with guns than gun-control laws are.

Japan: Japan has both very strict gun-control laws and a very low number of shootings each year, yet the gun-control laws don't seem to play a major role in reducing violence and deaths. In Japan, only a tiny fraction of people may own handguns, and the owners of rifles and shotguns must pass …

Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Beyond the Gun-Control Debate: This Reflection on the Virginia Tech Massacre Looks beyond the Gun Debate to the Importance of Cultural Morality in Reducing Senseless Crimes of Violence. Contributors: Williamsen, Kart - Author. Magazine title: The New American. Volume: 23. Issue: 11 Publication date: May 28, 2007. Page number: 17+. © 2009 American Opinion Publishing, Inc. COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale Group.

This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.