Government Size, Political Freedom and Economic Growth in Nigeria, 1960-2000

By Guseh, James S.; Oritsejafor, Emmanuel | Journal of Third World Studies, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview

Government Size, Political Freedom and Economic Growth in Nigeria, 1960-2000


Guseh, James S., Oritsejafor, Emmanuel, Journal of Third World Studies


INTRODUCTION

Determining the most effective political economic system for the development of a society is an important issue. Until the early 1990s, the world was characterized by two models of development--socialism, led by the Soviet Union, and capitalism, led by the United States. With the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, countries are abandoning socialism and adopting democratic capitalism. Since 1972, Freedom House has provided annual rankings of political freedom and civil liberties for countries around the world. (1) In 1972, while 43 countries were rated free, today 89 countries are rated free. (2) Over the same period, the percentage of free states has increased from 29 to 46 while the percentage of the not-free states has decreased from 46 to 25. (3)

In the case of Africa, modest but significant gains have been made in the quest for democratic governance. In sub-Saharan Africa, while only 2 countries, The Gambia and Mauritius, were considered free in 1972, currently 11 countries are classified as free. (4) The countries are Benin, Botswana, Cape Verde, Ghana, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritius, Namibia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal and South Africa. (5)

Although Nigeria is not among the currently free countries in Africa, it is one of the countries that have embarked on pursuing democratic market institutions. However, the political process in pursuit of such institutions has been turbulent. Since independence in 1960, Nigeria has been ruled mostly by military regimes. During its 45 years of independence (1960-2005), the country has experienced 29 years of military rule and 16 years of civilian rule.

As the country tries to adopt democratic institutions, an assessment of the impact of the government and the political structures on economic growth is important. What has been the impact of this political process on the economy? The purpose of this study is to address this question. More specifically, this paper will analyze the Nigerian political economy by assessing the impacts of government size, political freedom, and openness of the economy on economic growth over the period 1960-2000. Although several studies have examined this issue, none has focused on the specific case of Nigeria. (6) On the other hand, studies that have focused on the case of Nigeria have not assessed the impact of certain variables, such as political freedom and openness of the economy, on economic growth. (7) This study addresses the limitations of previous studies by incorporating these variables in the analysis. This study also covers a period of 40 years since independence, one of the longest time-series employed in studying the political economy of Nigeria. Such a richer study should provide further insights into the determinants of economic growth in Nigeria.

The next two sections present an overview of the Nigerian political and economic performance. These are followed by a review of studies on the relationship between government size, democracy, and economic growth. Next is an assessment of the impact of government size, political freedom, and openness of the economy on economic growth in Nigeria. The paper concludes with a summary and some policy implications.

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

On October 1, 1960, Nigeria became an independent state under a parliamentary system of government. Like most African countries, Nigeria has continued to struggle with what appears to be an elusive goal for political and economic freedoms even after more than forty-five years of independence. The country has experienced numerous military coups and counter coups and has survived a secessionist civil war. The attainment of political independence does not seem to have transformed the state because the indigenous elites that replaced the colonial administrators have failed to implemented policies to move the country forward politically and economically. The indigenous elites inherited a state that was not designed to cater to the needs of the Nigerian people; yet these elites were content with the political structures designed by the colonialists. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Government Size, Political Freedom and Economic Growth in Nigeria, 1960-2000
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.