Institutional Adjustment Planning for Full Employment

By Kaboub, Fadhel | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Institutional Adjustment Planning for Full Employment


Kaboub, Fadhel, Journal of Economic Issues


The idea of government as the Employer of Last Resort (ELR) has been present in the Institutionalist literature since the early twentieth century. In 1919, well before Keynes recognized that capitalist economies lack an inherent mechanism to create full employment, John Dewey wrote:

   The first great demand of a better social order, I should say,
   then, is the guarantee of the right, to every individual who is
   capable of it, to work--not the mere legal right which is
   enforceable so that the individual will always have the
   opportunity to engage in some form of useful activity, and if
   the ordinary economic machinery breaks down through a crisis
   of some sort, then it is the duty of the state to come to the
   rescue and see that individuals have something to do that is
   worth while--not breaking stones in a stoneyard, or something
   else to get a soup ticket with, but some kind of productive work
   which a self-respecting person may engage in with interest and with
   more than mere pecuniary profit. Whatever may be said about the
   fortune of what has technically been called socialism, it would
   seem to be simply part of ordinary common sense that society
   should reorganize itself to make sure that individuals can make
   a living and be kept going, not by charity, but by having
   productive work to do. ([1919] 1939, 420-421)

Several prominent institutionalists such as Morris Copeland (1967), Wendell Gordon (1980; 1997), and Hyman Minsky (1986) have strongly expressed their support to an ELR policy to deal with persistent unemployment. This paper argues that Fagg Foster's theory of Institutional Adjustment (IA) provides an insightful contribution to the way in which ELR might be introduced to ensure successful implementation. Foster argued that "... all answers to all real economic problems necessarily take the form of institutional adjustment" (Foster 1981a, 946). Therefore, ELR too should be viewed as a process of institutional adjustment. This paper demonstrates that ELR with IA planning addresses many of the challenges that ELR critics predict. Consequently, it provides a brief overview of the ELR program and Foster's theory of IA, followed by an assessment of how IA planning can help ELR deal with structural and technological unemployment problems, and closes with concluding remarks.

ELR Explained

Contemporary ELR policy, a la Hyman Minsky, proposes that the government ought to create "an infinitely elastic demand for labor at a floor or minimum wage that does not depend upon long- and short-run business profit expectations. Since only the government can divorce the offering of employment from the profitability of hiring workers, the infinitely elastic demand for labor must be created by government" (Minsky 1986, 308). As such, the government guarantees a real job opportunity for anyone ready, willing, and able to work at a fixed socially-established basic wage (plus benefits), thus exogenously setting the price of labor. With ELR, the government will provide a price anchor and establish greater price stability. During a recession, the size of the ELR pool increases to absorb workers displaced from the private sector, and when the economy booms it automatically shrinks when ELR workers find employment in the private sector, hence it operates as a buffer stock employment program. The ELR wage is fixed while the quantity of labor in the buffer stock fluctuates. Private sector employers can obtain labor at a mark-up over the ELR fixed wage; hence, the price-stabilization feature of the program. ELR is a decentralized program, to be financed by the national government, and is not meant to substitute for private sector (nor public sector) jobs but rather complements "the market" by acting as a buffer stock for labor (Wray 1998a; 1998b; 1999).

Building on Abba Lerner's functional finance theory, ELR proponents argue that the government always has the financial capacity to pay for the program.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Institutional Adjustment Planning for Full Employment
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?