Evidence-Based Mental Health Law: The Case for Legislative Change to Allow Earlier Intervention in Psychotic Illness

By Hayes, Robert; Nielssen, Olav et al. | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, April 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evidence-Based Mental Health Law: The Case for Legislative Change to Allow Earlier Intervention in Psychotic Illness


Hayes, Robert, Nielssen, Olav, Sullivan, Daniel, Large, Matthew, Bayliff, Kristie, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


Psychosis is a relatively common and severe mental disorder that results in impaired judgment and reasoning and is associated with an increased incidence of violence in the period before the initiation of treatment. Studies published since the Mental Health Act 1990 (New South Wales) was enacted have shown that the period before the emergence of acute symptoms (the prodrome) and first episode of illness carries a greatly increased risk of violence. It is also established that the longer-term prognosis is improved by early initiation of treatment. We believe the New South Wales Mental Health Act should be amended to reflect the scientific evidence of an increased risk of violence in the early stage of illness and the harm arising from delaying treatment. Emerging psychosis should be regarded as a medical emergency and the threshold for compulsory treatment for people in the early phase of psychotic illness should be lower.

**********

Psychotic illness, including schizophrenia, delusional disorders, bipolar mood disorder and psychosis arising from drug abuse, is a major cause of disability and cost to the community, both in providing care and in the lost output of those afflicted. (1) Psychosis is a relatively common condition, with between 20 and 30 new cases per 100,000 population per year (2) and a prevalence of chronic psychosis in our community of around 0.5%. (3) In recognition of past neglect of this common and disabling condition, federal and state governments have recently announced increased funding for mental health, particularly for early intervention programs and community treatment. (4)

There are many reasons for emotional and behavioural disturbances in young people for which medical assessment and intervention becomes necessary, of which the emergence of psychotic illness is one of the most serious. The much higher risk of suicide and violence associated with acute episodes of psychotic illness during the early phase of illness is the reason why most young people who are acutely psychotic are admitted to psychiatric hospitals for treatment, usually as involuntary patients. (5)

Current mental health legislation in New South Wales only allows for intervention when the person meets the legal definition of a 'mentally ill person' within the meaning of the Mental Health Act (MHA), even though an experienced clinician may be able to determine with reasonable certainty that the deterioration in a person's behaviour is due to the prodromal phase of psychotic illness, (6) and that the person is thereby at increased risk of causing or sustaining serious harm. (7)

While prediction of schizophrenia on the basis of prodromal symptoms, and the prediction of violence arising from abnormal mental states pose particular difficulties, the current MHA requires treating doctors and magistrates to make a judgment about risk if particular signs and symptoms of psychosis are present. In practice, the MHA is frequently given a narrow interpretation, requiring that the patient have fairly overt signs of psychosis before they are deemed able to be detained for treatment against their will.

A recent study of homicides by mentally ill people in New South Wales between 1992 and 2003 (8) shows that there is a greatly increased risk of a homicide during the early phase of psychotic illness. The study shows that, in retrospect, changes in behaviour and beliefs associated with a risk of violence were usually evident before the homicide took place. Other studies confirm the risk of violence (9,10,11) and suicide (12) during the early phase of mental illness.

The published studies showing a greatly increased risk of homicide and other violence during the first episode of psychotic illness establish the need for early intervention to prevent these catastrophic events. We argue that psychosis, or the likelihood that a person is becoming psychotic, is an inherently dangerous condition for which intervention and treatment is required.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evidence-Based Mental Health Law: The Case for Legislative Change to Allow Earlier Intervention in Psychotic Illness
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?