Marriage, Cohabitation, and Same-Sex Marriage

By Dnes, Antony W. | Independent Review, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

Marriage, Cohabitation, and Same-Sex Marriage


Dnes, Antony W., Independent Review


In this article, I explore some important limits to freedom imposed by family law and contribute to the recent debate about cohabitation and marriage. In particular, I consider a very heated topic at present internationally: Does the extension of marriage fights to homosexual cohabitants have any merit? To answer this question, I inquire into the relationship between marriage and cohabitation. Marriage represents a standard contract into which heterosexuals may opt, although increasingly they avoid doing so; homosexual couples, along with several other groups, such as nonintimate heterosexual cohabitants, are at present commonly prohibited from opting in. Following an examination of marriage as a special case of intimate cohabitation, I conclude at least in a qualified way that excluding homosexuals may be functional rather than discriminatory. I also consider the impact of changing marital law on heterosexuals. As Allen (2006) has pointed out, the nature of marriage is not accidental, but provides certain safeguards for the married, and the alteration of marital law to include new groups is likely to affect established groups. So the main question is whether marriage can be of practical use to same-sex couples. In the course of answering this question, I comment on the current international fashion of increasing the obligations of unmarried intimate cohabitants, which seems to be developing in parallel with the promotion of same-sex marriage and which also has implications for personal autonomy.

Some background information on international trends is helpful at the outset. Most U.S. states, including Connecticut and California, have attempted to declare unconstitutional the ban on homosexual marriage, which is reinforced federally by the Protection of Marriage Act. President George W. Bush has also suggested an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would stipulate that marriage is a social status reserved for heterosexuals. Such an amendment would not imply, however, that weaker, domestic-partnership laws would be repealed. In Europe, most European Union (EU) states have or are contemplating laws that treat domestic partners more or less the same as married persons in key areas such as property rights and pensions. Some countries, notably the Netherlands, claim that such legal status constitutes a form of gay marriage. (1) Canada, however, not the EU, arguably has the distinction of being first to introduce same-sex marriage, following Halpern v. Toronto City (Ontario Appeal Court 276 [2003]), a successful challenge of the restriction of marriage to heterosexuals. (2) An issue that often surfaces in considering the international movement toward widening marriage is whether the restriction of within-marriage or postdissolution rights and obligations to one rigid form of marriage contract is oppressive or purposeful. (3) Because extension of marriage-like structures to homosexuals tends to go hand in hand with creation of marriage-like obligations between heterosexual unmarried intimate cohabitants, it is best to consider wider issues concerning cohabitation in thinking about gay marriage. Pressures to change marriage may also have arisen because traditional forms no longer fit well. If so, reformed, obligated cohabitation may become a new, dominant form of marriage. This possibility is consistent with the aims of the U.S. marriage-covenant movement, which seeks to preserve traditional hard-to-dissolve marriage for those who want it.

In asking whether any useful purpose might be served by extending marriage rights to homosexuals or by increasing the obligations between cohabitants more generally defined, we are contemplating a movement in the boundary of marriage law. This boundary has moved on previous occasions in many jurisdictions, notably in relation to consanguinity and the remarriage of divorcees. The boundary also clearly differs between jurisdictions: consider the difficulty internationally of recognizing polygamous marriages formed in Islamic jurisdictions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Marriage, Cohabitation, and Same-Sex Marriage
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.