Armistice in the Recent Battle of the Books: Paul De Man, Claudio Guillen, and History

By Miner, Earl | CLIO, Fall 1994 | Go to article overview

Armistice in the Recent Battle of the Books: Paul De Man, Claudio Guillen, and History


Miner, Earl, CLIO


Some Distinctions

In the past few years, studies of English literature have undergone great changes in the English-reading world, changes differing somewhat in pace and direction in (for example) North America and Great Britain, in Australia, India, and Japan. Changes in literary studies are not identical with changes in literature. Nothing in English studies, however, compares with the shift from oral to scriptive literature or from the classical to modern in Japan and Korea. The recent (ca. century-old) teaching of vernacular literature, coeducation, and introduction of computer concordances has drastically altered literary study and its interpretation - changing its users while affecting its authors but little. Other changes affect both literature and its study, albeit differently: the burning of the library at Alexandria, inventions at various places and times of the codex and of printing, recovery of the Boswell and Reizei papers, etc.

The changes addressed in this account are those of literary study, particularly those denying or affirming "history," a word which, cried out in the crowded theater of the critics, no longer is assumed to endanger public safety or to violate the pure of theoretic mind with obscenity. Quite the contrary. We are now being reassured that various people who had assumed that thoughts of history would not violate their immaculacy were greatly concerned with the matter. The change has been a wonder, and one is tempted to say we have witnessed a defining moment.

Defining moments (Kuhnian paradigm shifts) are as rare, however, in literary as in other studies. Moreover, however old-fangled it seemed judged by Parisian fashions in the summer of theory's content, historical study really was the mainstream of practice. So let us reduce the claim for change from a defining to a symbolic moment - a time when things seem to have changed, a decisive point to have been reached, and the terms of operation to be altered. And in the spirit of Clio, let us consider this symbolic moment by setting its occurrence after an earlier one.

The earlier moment may be assigned the name of Noam Chomsky. At least, one of us feels that the syntactic sage marked a major shift in the convictions of intellectuals in the USA: to the assumption that a general theory of some large subject was both possible and desirable. It matters little that philosophically trained linguists may think Montague grammar superior to Chomsky's account. It matters even less that we paid for our discovery at that moment with some years of remarkably silly writing about surface and deep structures in literature. The fact is that we changed. Most of us relinquished our Anglo-Saxon suspicion of explicit theory, taking on a more European interest in it. In itself, the "Chomsky premise" was neither historical nor antihistorical. If we asked what led to Chomsky (is he or is he not a Cartesian?), what alternatives there had been and were to his conception, then it was one thing.

If all depended on a purely structural coexistence of the deep and the surface, then it was another. Saussure, we came to learn, propounded a strictly synchronic semiotics of language; and, as "the linguistic turn" continued, critical thinking began to shift radically from a then advance guard of phenomenology to varieties of Structuralism (proto-, plain, and post-). Then came an obituary of the author. Never mind that the funeral oration was pronounced by a prolific, signing author. Never mind that critics increasingly required the author figure to convict of their own unoriginal sin. Never mind that people were repeating things they failed to understand. Never mind the facile illogicality of the three-word determination on which so much depended: Language is indeterminate. But unite these with kindred trivialities and you have reason for change sufficient for another symbolic moment.

The Chomsky premise became an axiom assumed rather than remembered in celebration of "the death of the author," who - and this is rather a curiosity - was held (at least when male) to be felonious.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Armistice in the Recent Battle of the Books: Paul De Man, Claudio Guillen, and History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.