Using Research Data to Assist in Developing and Marketing Strategies to Enhance Knowledge of Relevant Law among Faculty and Academic Administrators in Colleges and Universities

By Wilson, Le Von E. | Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, July 2003 | Go to article overview

Using Research Data to Assist in Developing and Marketing Strategies to Enhance Knowledge of Relevant Law among Faculty and Academic Administrators in Colleges and Universities


Wilson, Le Von E., Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues


ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to measure knowledge of constitutional and federal statutory law relevant to public institutions of higher education receiving any form of federal funding. The study was designed to determine the percentage of faculty and academic administrators at higher educational institutions who could demonstrate a proficient knowledge concerning relevant legal issues related to constitutional and federal statutory law.

The investigation built upon that of Goellnitz (1993), who focused on the development and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of constitutional and federal statutory law relevant to public institutions of higher education. It was the Goellnitz instrument that was used for this study.

The instrument consisted of 25 True-False items. Eighteen items were designed to measure knowledge of constitutional law and 7 items were designed to assess knowledge of federal statutory law. The main question addressed in this study was, "What is the level of knowledge of relevant constitutional and federal statutory law of faculty and academic administrators in four-year public colleges and universities receiving any form of federal funding?"

The study participants were from the 16 constituent universities of the university of North Carolina. Faculty and academic administrators from each institution were included in the study. After administration of the instrument, which was essentially a test, the resultant data were treated by several appropriate statistical tests.

Several significant findings emerged from the analysis of the data. In general, faculty and academic administrators did not have a proficient knowledge of relevant law. Demographic factors, such as level of education, and years of experience, were not correlated with higher levels of knowledge. The most significant, however, was that scores for academic administrators at the various institutions were higher than those for faculty. Specific recommendations for future studies and for development of law-related training programs were made. By using these research data, senior university administrators may develop strategies and plans to enhance knowledge of relevant law among faculty and academic administrators in institutions of higher education.

INTRODUCTION

An analysis was conducted using an electronically mailed questionnaire to determine the knowledge levels of faculty and academic administrators at selected universities concerning federal statutory and case law related to higher education. The data from this study were analyzed by examining the percentage of respondents who attained the level of proficiency. This could help colleges and universities, and professional organizations plan for the development of instructional methodologies to provide faculty and academic administrators with the necessary law-related training. The demographics of the respondents were also contrasted with responses to identify patterns.

The purpose of this study was to measure level of knowledge of constitutional and federal statutory law relevant to public institutions of higher education receiving any form of federal funding. The study analyzed the legal knowledge levels of faculty and academic administrators at selected higher education institutions. The study determined overall knowledge level of the major legal issues by questioning two groups--faculty and academic administrators--with respect to specific areas of the law that are pertinent to their areas of responsibility and concern. These specific areas included: 1) equal protection, 2) freedom of expression, 3) privacy rights, and 4) due process of law as related to dealings and interactions with students. Information on demographics was also collected.

RESEARCH POPULATION

The population consisted of members of the faculty and administrative staff who are employed at one of the public four-year institutions of higher education in the 16 constituent universities of the University of North Carolina (UNC).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using Research Data to Assist in Developing and Marketing Strategies to Enhance Knowledge of Relevant Law among Faculty and Academic Administrators in Colleges and Universities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.