Commercialization in Defense Sourcing and Other Responses to Post-Cold War Defense Industry Transformation

By Marks, Gillian M.; Fry, Norman J. | Georgetown Journal of International Law, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview

Commercialization in Defense Sourcing and Other Responses to Post-Cold War Defense Industry Transformation


Marks, Gillian M., Fry, Norman J., Georgetown Journal of International Law


INTRODUCTION

The global defense industry, centuries in the making, has undergone a fundamental transformation in the last 15 years. This transformation is characterized by two key phenomena: First, there has been an unprecedented consolidation (1) in the defense industry itself precipitated by the dramatic drop in defense budgets following the end of the Cold War. (2) In addition to mere consolidation, the industry has transformed from one consisting of specialty manufacturers to a two-tiered structure of giant "systems integrators" and supporting, much smaller, specialty manufacturers. Second, the rapidly evolving, fast-paced, network- centric battlespace has driven astounding advances in military technology. (3) Sometimes, the pace of technological change has been so rapid that it even outstrips the ability of the defense industry to deliver the weapons and systems incorporating those advances before they are obsolete. (4)

Section I first examines the post-Cold War global transformation of the defense industry, and the underlying reasons for that transformation. It then discusses the impact this transformation has had on government defense procurement, principally in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Section II analyses how those governments have responded to the changes in the defense industry. The Article concludes in Section III by reasoning that although all of the government responses examined in Section II will be helpful in counteracting the diminution of competition in today's defense market, commercialization initiatives will be the most effective in increasing competition, lowering procurement cycle times, and minimizing costs. These trends, and the concomitant changes they have caused in the defense industry, are discussed in turn below.

I. POST-COLD WAR DEFENSE INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION

Section I.A briefly recounts the history of the modern defense industry. Prior to the sixteenth century, nations maintained only part-time armed forces that were supported, if at all, in an ad hoc manner. However, the rapid rise of world trade required the European powers to maintain large standing fleets and specialized industrial facilities to build and maintain them. For hundreds of years, wars resulted in the creation of new defense firms, many of which merged or went out of business in the succeeding peace; overall, the industry remained one of specialty manufacturers. Section I.B recounts a fundamental shift in this pattern following the Cold War, in which an industry of more than 50 specialty manufacturers became a highly concentrated industry of just five system integrators that broadly cut across the all sectors of the defense industry. Section I provides the backdrop for Section II, which postulates that competitive procurement (which governments have relied upon for technical innovation and economic savings in defense purchases) has suffered as a result of this consolidation, causing governments to resort to substitute strategies to deliver the benefits that they could previously obtain through vigorous competition between defense firms.

A. Development of the Defense Industry, from Early Origins to the Cold War

The modern defense industry traces its practical roots in the rise of the Royal Navy and other European naval and para-military fleets, such as those maintained by the Netherlands and the Dutch East Indies Company, in the 1500s. (5) Prior to about 1550, global trade was virtually non-existent and navies, to the extent that they existed at all, consisted of a few state warships and ad hoc collections of commercial vessels assembled for a particular purpose. (6) With the rise in global trade in the 1600s, European nations needed standing navies both to protect that trade and to attack the trading vessels of their competitors. (7) This gave rise to the development of a large infrastructure of royal forests for providing "naval stores" such as timber, tar and pitch, timber mills, textile mills for producing vast quantities of sail and line, docks and shipyards, foundries for cannon, shot, anchors, chain and other metal fittings and rudimentary chemical plants for the production of gunpowder, caulking, tar and pitch. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Commercialization in Defense Sourcing and Other Responses to Post-Cold War Defense Industry Transformation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.