Viewpoint: The OCC's Twisted Logic on Overdrafts

By Wilmarth, A. E., Jr. | American Banker, August 10, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Viewpoint: The OCC's Twisted Logic on Overdrafts


Wilmarth, A. E., Jr., American Banker


The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's interpretive letter 1082 once again demonstrates the agency's bias in favor of national banks and against consumers.

The OCC recently issued the letter against the background of a major class action - Miller v. Bank of America - in which a California trial court ordered Bank of America Corp. to pay $1.5 billion to a large group of depositors. The plaintiffs alleged that B of A wrongfully debited their deposit accounts for overdraft charges in violation of a California Supreme Court decision. That decision prohibited banks in California from exercising a right of setoff against deposit accounts that contain Social Security funds and other government payments.

A California appellate court overturned the trial court's judgment in Miller, but the California Supreme Court recently agreed to review the case.

The OCC's interpretive letter favors big national banks and hurts consumers in two ways. First, the OCC allows national banks to process overdraft items using an unfair method that maximizes their overdraft fees. As shown in the Miller case, the typical big bank first pays the largest check or other debit item received on an account on a particular day, even if that item is not first in time. Paying the largest item first increases the likelihood of an overdraft, in which case the bank imposes separate fees on each smaller item received on the same day.

The Center for Responsible Lending estimates that banks and credit unions collect $17.5 billion in overdraft fees each year, resulting in effective interest rates comparable to rates on predatory payday loans. The "largest check first" policy approved by the OCC is anticonsumer and aggravates the unreasonableness of national bank overdraft fees.

Second, IL 1082 asserts that a national bank "is not exercising its right to collect a debt" - and therefore is not governed by state law - when it debits an account to recover overdrafts and related fees. This assertion is designed to prevent depositors in Miller and similar cases from relying on state consumer protection laws.

As the letter admits, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held that national banks are subject to state law when they exercise "their right to collect their debts." However, this letter claims that a national bank does not create a "debt" when it allows an overdraft and does not "collect" a debt when it recovers the overdraft and related fees.

The OCC's tortured reasoning is contradicted by legal authorities and evidence introduced in Miller, which demonstrate that an overdraft creates a creditor-debtor relationship between the drawee bank and its customer, and that the drawee bank collects a debt when it recovers the overdraft and related fees.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Viewpoint: The OCC's Twisted Logic on Overdrafts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?