Love Thy Neighbour; ANALYSIS ...and Equality for All Trying to Help Some Communities Risks Alienating Them and Reinforcing Divisions, So a New Approach Is Needed to Treating All People Equally, Says Dr Chris Allen, Director of Research and Policy at a Birmingham Human Rights Charity

The Birmingham Post (England), August 16, 2007 | Go to article overview

Love Thy Neighbour; ANALYSIS ...and Equality for All Trying to Help Some Communities Risks Alienating Them and Reinforcing Divisions, So a New Approach Is Needed to Treating All People Equally, Says Dr Chris Allen, Director of Research and Policy at a Birmingham Human Rights Charity


Byline: Dr Chris Allen

Having watched the images of communities overcoming adversity as a result of the recent floods in Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire, you cannot help but empathise with the problems that the people living in those areas must have been facing.

When events like this arise, many are quick to stress the sense of community spirit that gets people through such times.

In many ways this message can be reassuring, confirming to people that not only do communities still exist but they are a positive influence and force for good.

Very few people would disagree with this. Yet if you had looked closely at the television images of those queuing for fresh water, you would have seen that the people themselves are widely diverse and different: a community of communities maybe. Yet despite this, the same old sense of community and what's good about it appears to remain.

The dictionary definition of a community is one where people live together in one place, sometimes with a sense of common ownership.

In more recent years however, there has been a tendency to use the term community to lump people together on the basis of their identity, stressing this aspect of the definition in preference of those merely living together in one place.

The increasingly popular notion of community overlooks or even eradicates that necessary recognition of diversity and difference that vibrant and real communities - such as those overcoming adversity in Gloucestershire or in today's Birmingham - typically contain.

In the coming decade Birmingham and its inhabitants will become "super-diverse". To ensure that Birmingham as community therefore remains a force for good, ensuring that everyone is treated equally, will become increasingly central to the city's ongoing success.

If this is not achieved, then a lack of equality and the division of people into single identity communities could be easily used to not only identify but, more worryingly, single out and even scapegoat particular sections of society.

We only have to look back over recent months to see how events in Birmingham cause some to hold their breath in the hope that a concerted backlash against certain groups of people fail to materialise.

For Birmingham as indeed elsewhere, this understanding of community can be problematic and can play into the hands of the mischief-makers who want to exploit the tensions and fractures that also clearly exist.

When social and community challenges therefore arise, for many in society those challenges and "problems" belong to "them" rather than "us". In doing so, not only do we see them as being clearly different from us, but we also see them presenting a challenge to us in terms of our values, way of life, culture and so on. Because of this, not all people in our community are treated equally.

This attitude and approach to understanding and identifying difference is sometimes reinforced both in politics and also by spokespeo-ple for particular groups, or dare I say it, different communities.

Take for instance the Governments Preventing Extremism Together (PET) programme that is currently being rolled out across Birmingham in the form of projects (like raising awareness of Islam and training imams). By funding Muslim groups and initiatives only, the programme runs the risk of inadvertently attributing the "problem" of extremism to Muslim communities alone. In this way extremism - and more importantly preventing extremism - becomes something for most people in the city that is more about "them" than it is about "us".

With the emphasis being placed upon what Muslims should be doing, an opportunity is being squandered that might allow society as a whole to take a shared responsibility for preventing extremism together through promoting common ownership of the problem.

An approach that sees people and communities as having a single identity alone was recently identified as problematic in the findings of the recent Commission on Integration & Cohesions report. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Love Thy Neighbour; ANALYSIS ...and Equality for All Trying to Help Some Communities Risks Alienating Them and Reinforcing Divisions, So a New Approach Is Needed to Treating All People Equally, Says Dr Chris Allen, Director of Research and Policy at a Birmingham Human Rights Charity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.