Recent Shifts in Determinants of Internet Banking Adopters: Empirical Evidence from 2001 and 2004 SCF

By Babiarz, Patryk; DeVaney, Sharon A. | Consumer Interests Annual, Annual 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Recent Shifts in Determinants of Internet Banking Adopters: Empirical Evidence from 2001 and 2004 SCF


Babiarz, Patryk, DeVaney, Sharon A., Consumer Interests Annual


The purpose was to investigate whether there were shifts in the factors affecting the probability of adopting Internet banking. The technology acceptance model, the theory of planned behavior, and previous research were used to develop a model. Data were drawn from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances. Three shifts were identified. In 2004, households adopted Internet banking regardless of income while income was a determinant in 2001. Second, the length of the planning horizon was not significant in 2004 suggesting that household's use Internet banking was a convenience and not a result of long-term planning. Third, occupation as a proxy for social norm influenced the probability of adopting Internet banking.

Introduction

Security First Network Bank (SFNB) was founded in October, 1995 in Atlanta, Georgia. This institution claimed to be the first ever 'pure' Internet bank (Cramer and Harrell, 1996). Even though it has only been a decade since SFNB was established, no respectable financial institution in the world today functions without extending its offer via Internet. Advancement in information technology, which enabled implementation of digital services, has rapidly gained recognition of financial institutions in the last years. Accessing banks online has become a regular practice of 35% of U.S. households, and it is a forecast that 55 million households will use online banking services by 2010 (Bruene, 2005).

The phenomenon of rapid advancement in implementation of information technology by banks has attracted a significant amount of researchers' attention. Numerous studies, employing a variety of methodologies addressed the adoption of Internet banking. Kim, Widdows and Yilmazer (2005) investigated the determinants of Internet banking adoption based on individuals' benefits and costs. Their study used the 2001 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). A similar study by Gerrard and Cunningham (2003) addressed the economic benefits of Internet banking adoption among customers in Singapore. Chang (2003) found that 25% of the population in Korea adopted electronic banking, which means, that in some countries Internet banking has become a widespread service. Some researchers have also addressed the adoption of Internet banking based on the diffusion of innovation and technology acceptance model, or theory of planed behavior (Chang, 2003; Lee, Lee, and Eastwood, 2003; Chau and Lai, 2003). Jun and Cal (2001) addressed the problem of determinants of Internet banking adoption incorporating perceived service quality as a relevant factor explaining adoption. The problem has also been explored from the supply side perspective (Gopalakrishnan, Wischnevsky, and Damanpour, 2003; Tan and Teo, 2000) and in the qualitative studies of adoption of Internet banking among corporate customers (Rotchanakitumnuai and Speece, 2003).

While the previous studies answer the questions about determinants of consumers' adoption of Internet banking, no one has investigated the shifts in the determinants of Internet banking adoption with data from the U.S. Some researchers admit that due to the turbulent nature of the electronic services market, the determinants of adoption of online services still need attention (Kolodinsky, 2004). Providers of online banking services could benefit from learning how these determinants have evolved over recent years. This knowledge could help to adjust market offers by targeting the most promising groups of potential customers. Bank managers understand why they should encourage customers to utilize the electronic banking channel. Their benefits are described by Chang (2002), who compared the average costs of money transfer transactions. For traditional checking transaction the cost is estimated at approximately $1, for ATM or telephone banking it varies between $.30 and $.50, while the cost of Internet transaction is less than $.01.

The purpose of this research is to determine the dynamics of change in the determinants of adoption of online banking services.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Recent Shifts in Determinants of Internet Banking Adopters: Empirical Evidence from 2001 and 2004 SCF
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?