Changes in Characteristics of Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Borrowers between 2001 and 2004

By Li, Min; Weagley, Robert O. | Consumer Interests Annual, Annual 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Changes in Characteristics of Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Borrowers between 2001 and 2004

Li, Min, Weagley, Robert O., Consumer Interests Annual

To examine whether the characteristics of adjustable-rate mortgage borrowers changed over the 2001-2004 period, the study compares the distributions of these demographic characteristics in the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finance (SCF) using two methods. However, we find that there are different results when we apply the two methods. The study explains the differences between these two approaches and concludes that a small change exists in the use of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) by lower income, younger, single-headed, low-education families. Meantime, a noteworthy increase of ARM use exists in higher income or wealthy, well-educated and white families. Keywords: Mortgage market, adjustable-rate mortgages, mortgage financial education


Despite rising house prices, more and more people became homeowners. The homeownership rate increased from 68.0% in 2002 to 68.8% in 2005 as shown by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. A recent study performed by Finke, Huston, Siman and Corlija which used Survey of Consumer Finance (SCF) data set from 1989 through 2001 suggests that households holding adjustable-rate mortgage shifted to financially vulnerable families such as lower income, younger and less educated families. Their study urged those vulnerable groups to be targeted for special financial education in the long run interest.

Have the characteristics of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) borrowers changed over the 2001-2004 period? In order to examine the change in the proportion of ARMs that is in the mortgage market and in the characteristics of ARMs borrowers respectively, the present paper that followed the study of Finke et al. compares the proportions of ARMs in the SCF between 2001 and 2004. The two different results are found by two different methods. We explain the differences in the two results and then find the changes in the characteristics of ARMs borrowers. The analysis of the surveys indicates that the proportion of ARMs, as a proportion of total loan, substantially increased in the mortgage market over the 2001-2004 period. But the proportion of ARMs held by low income or low wealth families presented a small change during the same period. Finally, we support the suggestion that it is necessary to implement the financial education for these financially vulnerable groups.

Literature Review

Fixed rate mortgages (FRMs) have a fixed rate cost for the length of a loan, while the rate on an ARM fluctuates with the market. The appeal of an ARM is the low initial interest rate, easing borrowing constraints. However, the danger is an unanticipated increase in the rate could hurt some families' ability to pay off (Curry, 2004) if the rate is reduced the borrowers benefit. But with rates going up, hundreds or even thousands of dollars may be added to a borrower's annual interest expense and monthly payment. In addition, Hagerty (2004) believes if rates do rise and stay high, most borrowers will reduce other kinds of spending because they need to pay off the increasing monthly payments. That would have a negative impact for the economy as a whole.

One reason for the substantially rising homeownership rate is low mortgage rates experienced during 2001-04 period. The adjustable rate of mortgage dropped 1.85% from January of 2001 to April of 20043. With respect to mortgage type, ARMs have become more popular among consumers in recent years. The share of ARMs, as a percentage of all mortgages, accounted for 34% of mortgage market in 2004 (FREDDIE MAC ARM annual survey, 2004). According to the Mortgage Bankers Association's (MBA) 2004 Single-Family Mortgage Activity Survey (2005), in the second half of 2004, 46% of new mortgages were ARMs. About half of these ARMs were hybrids which had initial low fixed-rate periods of at least three or five years, followed by an adjustable rate.

A common accepted opinion is that households with more stable income, lower risk aversion, and higher probability of moving prefer to choose ARM (Campbell and Cocco, 2003).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Changes in Characteristics of Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Borrowers between 2001 and 2004


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?