Crisis? What Crisis? Water Soft Path Proponents Swim against a Current of Sparse Data, Skeptical Citizens and Policy Barriers

By Holtz, Susan | Alternatives Journal, September-October 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Crisis? What Crisis? Water Soft Path Proponents Swim against a Current of Sparse Data, Skeptical Citizens and Policy Barriers

Holtz, Susan, Alternatives Journal

THE SINGLE most important characteristic of a water soft path is that it is about sustainability as a new, additional and explicit goal for water management. Unlike traditional water planning, the soft path takes into account the water requirements for in situ functions of the natural resource. This new perspective acknowledges the vital importance of maintaining ecological "services" like nutrient cycling and aquatic habitat, as well as on-site uses such as boating and hydroelectric power production. However, even in a relatively water-rich country such as Canada, the capacity of the resource to sustain these functions can be compromised before water shortages for agriculture, industry and domestic use become acute. At some point, therefore, water withdrawals and diversion will need to be limited. This fact drives the water soft path.

Studies presented in The Soft Path for Water in a Nutshell (FOE 2006) and described in this issue of Alternatives indicate that, especially in seasonal low-flow periods, shortfalls of replenishable water throughout much of southern Canada are nearer at hand than most people appreciate. In many other parts of the world, such shortfalls are already reality.

In addition to telling us something of the state of our water resources, the studies in this report demonstrate that with a soft path approach, sustainable water use in Canada is within reach. The soft path provides the new tools needed to achieve this: backcasting, matching water quality to water needs, and treating water as a service rather than as a requirement. But know-how is not enough. Implementation of a water soft path also requires policy change in water management, change that affects decision making by water utilities, and planning and other agencies at all levels of government.

Policy by definition involves establishing the overall direction that is taken on some issue. However, as listed in "Barriers Along the Path," there are a number of hurdles to overcome if decision makers and the public are to be convinced of the need for change.

Policy making by default

Policy making by default is the first obstacle that water soft path advocates must surmount. Policy choices aren't always deliberately framed by politicians and political parties. Sometimes corporate, bureaucratic or administrative decisions can limit available options for decades, effectively creating public policy. Or policy can be set by not making decisions even when there is reason to rethink alternatives and priorities. Canada's decades-long failure to develop a climate change strategy is a case in point. With water policy, business-asusual decisions, especially about infrastructure, can set water management priorities for years to come, keeping water soft path ideas on the margins. Without ever being actively rejected, a water soft path approach could be sidelined indefinitely.

Paradoxically, with a water soft path, change can be even more difficult because this approach builds on, rather than rejects, current aspects of water management. Today's model for delivering water services in Canada is still dominated by the public health and technical achievements of the past century. In many places, demand management programs have been added. But safe water systems and demand management strategies are incorporated into a water soft path. As a result, a soft path approach may not appear dramatically different, making the attention and commitment needed for its implementation harder to gain.

If there is to be progress on water soft path policies, it will require an understanding both of what can be done differently and why things need to change. Knowing who the actors are, and how they can shift policy direction is also important if water management is to move toward a water soft path and sustainability.

Policy that limits use

The primary goal of traditional business-as-usual water planning is to provide the infrastructure to tap, treat and distribute water so that people have a safe, adequate water supply for all their perceived needs.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Crisis? What Crisis? Water Soft Path Proponents Swim against a Current of Sparse Data, Skeptical Citizens and Policy Barriers


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?