Class Action Foodborne-Illness Claims

By Weisbecker, Andrew | Journal of Environmental Health, September 2007 | Go to article overview

Class Action Foodborne-Illness Claims


Weisbecker, Andrew, Journal of Environmental Health


Editor's note: The Journal recognizes the importance of providing readers with practical and relevant legal information through Legal Briefs columns. In every other issue of the Journal, this information is presented by one or more of several insightful and dedicated columnists: Bill Marler, Denis Stearns, Drew Falkenstein, Patti Waller, and David W. Babcock, all of the law firm Marler Clark.

The attorneys at Seattle-based Marler Clark, LLP, PS (www.marlerclark.com) have developed a nationally known practice in the field of food safety. Marler Clark represents people who have been seriously injured, or the families of those who have died, after becoming ill with foodborne illness during outbreaks traced to restaurants, grocery chains, and other food suppliers. The attorneys have litigated thousands of food contamination cases throughout the United States, many of them high-profile, including the Jack in the Box and Odwalla E. coli outbreaks; the Malt-O-Meal, Sun Orchard, and Chili's Salmonella outbreaks; the Senor Felix Shigella outbreak; and the Subway and Chi-Chi's hepatitis A outbreaks.

Andrew Weisbecker, author of this month's Legal Briefs, is a partner in Marler Clark. Throughout his career, Mr. Weisbecker has been especially concerned with the representation of minor children in serious personal-injury and wrongful-death claims. Since 1998, his practice has focused on food product liability cases and foodborne-illness outbreaks.

A class action lawsuit is a civil lawsuit brought by one person or a few people as representatives of a larger group--the proposed "class"--whose members have suffered similar harm or have similar claims. Bringing a class action lawsuit serves three main purposes: 1) administrative efficiency, 2) conservation of judicial resources, and 3) quick achievement of a group remedy.

Class action lawsuits offer a number of advantages:

1. They provide for the cost-effective adjudication of small claims when the costs of litigation would far outweigh any potential recovery if the claims were brought individually. (1)

2. In cases with common questions of law and fact, the aggregation of claims into a class action may avert the need to repeat "days of the same witnesses, exhibits and issues from trial to trial." (2)

3. A class treatment of claims provides the means to effectively impose the costs of wrongdoing on a defendant, thereby deterring future wrongful activities.

4. A class action provides for uniform treatment of the defendant in a single venue, as opposed to the varying outcomes and standards that may be applied to a single defendant facing individual lawsuits in several different courts and jurisdictions.

5. In cases in which the defendant has limited funds to pay multiple claims, a class action centralizes all claims into one venue, where a court can equitably divide the assets among all the plaintiffs if they win the case.

In order to start a class action, one or more plaintiffs must first file a lawsuit claiming some type of common harm. The original plaintiff(s) must define the membership of the proposed class and must then ask the court to certify the case as a class action. According to both federal and state law, the original plaintiffs seeking class certification must generally provide evidence to convince the court that the proposed class meets the following criteria:

* numerosity -- the class is so large as to make individual suits impractical,

* commonality -- proposed class members have legal or factual claims in common,

* typicality -- claims or defenses are typical of the plaintiffs or defendants, and

* adequacy of representation -- the representative parties will adequately protect the interests of the class.

In most cases, the party seeking certification must also show:

* predominance -- the issues between the class and the defendants that will predominate in the proceedings are ones that class members have in common, as opposed to individual fact-specific conflicts between class members and the defendants; and

* superiority -- the class action is superior to individual litigation as a vehicle for resolution of the disputes at hand. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Class Action Foodborne-Illness Claims
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.