Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis

By Brunsdon, Chris; Fotheringham, Stewart et al. | Geographical Analysis, October 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis


Brunsdon, Chris, Fotheringham, Stewart, Charlton, Martin, Geographical Analysis


In this article, we propose a novel analysis technique for geographical data, Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis. This approach adapts the method of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), allowing the modeling and prediction of categorical response variables. As with GWR, the relationship between predictor and response variables may alter over space, and calibration is achieved using a moving kernel window approach. The methodology is outlined and is illustrated with an example analysis of voting patterns in the 2005 UK general election. The example shows that similar social conditions can lead to different voting outcomes in different parts of England and Wales. Also discussed are techniques for visualizing the results of the analysis and methods for choosing the extent of the moving kernel window.

Introduction

In this article, an extension to discriminant analysis is proposed, which allows the discrimination rule to vary over space. The term Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis (GWDA) is proposed for this new method. The motivation here is similar to that for Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)--in some situations, relationships between variables are not universal, but dependent on location. A major distinction between the two techniques is that, while GWR attempts to predict a measurement or ratio scale variable y given a set of predictors x = {[x.sub.1],..., [x.sub.m]}, GWDA analysis attempts to predict a categorical y variable. This is not the first article to suggest an application of geographical weighting to categorical data following the suggestions of Fotheringham, Brunsdon, and Charlton (2002). Atkinson et al. (2003) explore the relationships between riverbank erosion and various environmental variables using geographically weighted logistic regression, and Paez (2006) examines geographical variations in land use/transportation relationships using a geographically weighted probit model. There are similarities between discriminant analysis and logistic regression in that both are used to predict group membership from a set of predictor variables. The assumptions underlying each technique are rather different. Logistic regression may be the method of choice when the dependent variable has two groups due to its more relaxed assumptions (Maddala 1983).

In common with existing discussions of discriminant analysis, it is helpful to regard the data used here as having been drawn from a number of distinct populations, one for each unique category of y. The task of GWDA is then to assess which population a given, unlabeled {x} is likely to have come from. The difference between GWDA and standard discriminant analysis is that for GWDA this decision is made taking the geographical location of {x} into account. The GWDA technique proposed here exploits the fact that linear and quadratic discriminant analyses (LDA and QDA) rely only on the mean vector and covariance matrix of {x} for each population (the former assumes that the covariance is the same for all m populations). This being the case, the route to localizing LDA and QDA is via geographically weighted means and covariances, such as those proposed in Brunsdon, Fotheringham, and Charlton (2002) and Fotheringham, Brunsdon, and Charlton (2002). In the next section, LDA and QDA are reviewed. Following this, extending these techniques to forms of GWDA is considered. Finally, an empirical example using voting data in England and Wales is presented.

A review of discriminant analysis

Discriminant analysis is a technique used to identify which population a certain observation vector x belongs to, given a list of possible populations {1,..., m} and a training set of observations {[x.sub.ij]} where ij indicates the ith observation from population j. The simplest case occurs when m = 2 so that a binary classification has to be made. In this case, Fisher (1936) has used a decision theoretic approach to show that an optimal decision rule is to assign to population 1 if

[[[f.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.