Changing the Laws of War: Conference Seeks to Legitimize Civilian Casualties

By Friel, Howard | National Catholic Reporter, October 5, 2007 | Go to article overview

Changing the Laws of War: Conference Seeks to Legitimize Civilian Casualties


Friel, Howard, National Catholic Reporter


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism In the United States and the Institute for Counter Terrorism in Israel are sponsoring a conference Oct. 8 in Washington to argue for changes in international humanitarian law--also called the "laws of war"--that protects civilians in armed conflict.

The conference, titled "New Battlefields, Old Laws," developed from a meeting between Mitchel Wallerstein, dean of the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University, to which the Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism belongs, and Boaz Ganor, director of the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel, home of the Institute for Counter Terrorism, during the Lebanon War between Israel and Hezbollah in summer 2006. What it amounts to is a public diplomacy exercise to conceal war crimes.

Dr. Ganor told The Jerusalem Post, "We talked about the frustration we had over how the world was relating to the war, mainly the claim that Israel wasn't responding with 'proportionality.'" Dr. Wallerstein told Yediot Ahronot, Israel's largest-circulation newspaper: "Last summer, the IDF [Israel Defense Force] faced the issue of human shields, and the storing of weapons in civilian areas. We've seen this in other places such as Somalia and the Balkans. We are likely to see this again. International law does not adequately deal with this issue." Dr. Wallerstein also said that Israel had "little alternative than to attack these [Lebanese] villages, both from the air and on the ground."

The concerns of Dr. Wallerstein and Dr. Ganor were not that Israel had in fact responded disproportionately to an armed raid by Hezbollah, and that Israel had bombed villages in Lebanon, but that Israel was criticized for its response and that international law did not validate these Israeli actions.

According to the conference Web site, "asymmetric warfare mounted by non-state terrorist groups ... leave the defending state with little choice but to respond in ways that inflict heavy casualties." An in-house publication of the Maxwell School also stated, "Terrorism often leaves the defending state with little choice but to respond in ways that inflict heavy civilian casualties."

The institutional assumption of the Maxwell School is that the infliction of heavy civilian casualties by the United States and Israel may be occasionally necessary, is inherently legitimate as the response of a "defending state" against "non-state terrorist groups," and thus requires validation under international humanitarian law. The goal of the U.S.-Israeli conference is to propose modifications to that body of law.

Before considering a new protocol to the Geneva Conventions, as the conference sponsors propose, it might be prudent to consider the nature of the heavy civilian casualties inflicted by the presumptive "defending states"--Israel and the United States--in three areas of recent and current conflict.

Lebanon

On July 12, 2006, Hezbollah militants conducted an armed raid into northern Israel, killing three Israeli soldiers and capturing two others. The raid was apparently intended to capture Israeli soldiers to trade for Hezbollah and Lebanese prisoners held in Israel. While hostage-taking is a violation of the laws of war, both Israel and Hezbollah have done it and have subsequently negotiated prisoner exchanges in 1985, 1998, 2000 and 2004. While the Hezbollah raid was deplorable, it was limited.

As such, the Hezbollah incursion did not constitute an "armed attack" under international law, whereby, in the generally accepted formulation, military forces cross an international boundary in visible, massive and sustained form, when the necessity for action is instant, overwhelming, and leaves no choice of means and no moment for deliberation. Since the right of "self-defense" under the U.N. Charter arises only if an "armed attack" has occurred, Israel's decision to bomb Lebanon in response to the Hezbollah provocation did not constitute self-defense under the U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Changing the Laws of War: Conference Seeks to Legitimize Civilian Casualties
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.