Doctor Who Supported ARVs Stands Up for Hippocratic Oath Ethics in Unfair Dismissal Case

Cape Times (South Africa), October 18, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Doctor Who Supported ARVs Stands Up for Hippocratic Oath Ethics in Unfair Dismissal Case


BYLINE: Khopotso Bodibe

DOCTOR Malcolm Naude wants the government to recognise that doctors have the right to follow their consciences when treating patients and that they are guided by the Hippocratic Oath rather than changing government policy.

Naude is pursing a case of unfair dismissal against the Mpumalanga Health Department after being fired from his position as a medical officer at Rob Ferreira Hospital in 2001.

Naude believes he was fired for supporting a programme called the Greater Nelspruit Rape Intervention Programme (Grip), which had started offering anti-retroviral medication to rape victims to reduce their risk of HIV infection.

"Doctors, no matter who they work for and what kind of environment they're in, should be able to make decisions that have their patients' best interests at heart," Naude said.

"If that's in contradiction to national policy or a regional whim, doctors should be able to make decisions that look after their patients and make sure that they have the best possible medical care."

His case, which has taken six years to get to the Labour Court, was postponed to December 6.

Naude's attorney, Dan Pretorius, said: "What we're looking for is an acknowledgement that doctors have to obey their own consciences; that doctors have ethical responsibilities; that doctors should put the interests of their patients first.

"When it comes to doctors, the main code of ethics is the ancient Hippocratic Oath. So far, we haven't managed to get the Department of Health to sign an acknowledgement to say this applies to doctors in state hospitals. That's a settlement that we've got and they haven't agreed to make that settlement."

The oath requires doctors to do no harm and act in the best interests of their patients.

While the Mpumalanga department has yet to respond to Naude's settlement offer, national Health Ministry spokesperson Sibane Mngadi said it did not pose a problem for the government.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Doctor Who Supported ARVs Stands Up for Hippocratic Oath Ethics in Unfair Dismissal Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?