Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Organizational Culture Putting the Organizational Culture Concept to Work

By: Olson, Ryan | The Behavior Analyst Today, Fall 2002 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Organizational Culture Putting the Organizational Culture Concept to Work


Olson, Ryan, The Behavior Analyst Today


The concept of organizational culture (OC) is a potential candidate for every organizational psychologist's conceptual toolbox. Organizational clients consider OC to be critical for recruiting and retaining employees, and academic literature on the topic implicates cultural variables as being highly relevant during organizational change initiatives. The notion that the shared learning experiences of organizational members may have beneficial or harmful effects on performance improvement or behavior change interventions should be intriguing to any professional who specializes in such technologies. In this regard, the OC concept may help a performance improvement specialist or behavioral specialist to consider important aspects of organizational complexity. However, traditional approaches to this topic tend to be descriptively focused, emphasize the power of private behavior, and do not necessarily point the organizational practitioner in fruitful directions. For these reasons, it may be useful to supplement the OC concept with the total performance system concept and the perspective of selection by consequences. This type of conceptual focus may help the specialized fields of applied behavior analysis, organizational behavior management, and human performance technology make better use of the OC concept when the goal is organizational, process, or individual and group performance improvement. Key Words: Organizational Culture, Organizational Change, Performance Improvement, Behavior Analysis, Systems Analysis, and Selectionism

**********

PUTTING THE ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE CONCEPT TO WORK

By the time we reach adulthood, chances are that we have developed preferences for the types of organizations we would like to join, work at, or patronize. These preferences are obviously influenced by convenient access to the organization and the type and quality of services, products, and other benefits available to members or patrons, but these preferences are also based on other things. One of those "other things" may be summarized by the concept of organizational culture (OC).

Beyond the argument that OC can promote loyal patronage and membership, it is sometimes implied that different types of cultures are associated with excellent or deficient organizational performance, with the type of performance depending upon the type and strength of the culture under scrutiny (Daft & Noe, 2001). This notion should be especially interesting to scientists and practitioners interested in organizational change and performance improvement, including people who would identify with the fields of applied behavior analysis (ABA), organizational behavior management (OBM), or human performance technology (HPT). However, rather than adding a useful concept to the organizational practitioner's tool box, the OC concept runs the risk of functioning only as a post hoc explanatory fiction when things go really well or really bad for a company. To accomplish something more than this, the OC concept must be used in a selective and measured fashion when change or improvement is the goal.

Is Organizational Culture Worthy of Your Conceptual Toolbox?

OC is an important concept within the broad fields of industrial and organizational (1/0) psychology and organizational behavior (OB), with introductory 1/0 and OB textbooks dedicating sections or entire chapters to the topic (e.g., Daft & Noe, 2001; Muchinsky, 2003; Robbins, 2003). Daft and Noe (2001) reported that a sample of CEOs from fortune 500 companies believed " ... organizational culture to 0be the most important variable for attracting and retaining talented employees, which is an important contributing variable to overall organizational excellence" (p. 585). Surveys like this one, conducted by Fortune magazine, illustrate high corporate interest in organizational culture, with this particular group of CEOs ranking the concept at the top of their list of variables affecting recruitment and retention success. Applied organizational scientists and practitioners from every tradition are obligated to address the concerns of society and/or their clients, and OC is certainly a salient concern.

From a different but equally important vantage point, alluded to earlier, OC is sometimes presented as a variable that can help or hinder organizational change efforts, organizational adaptation to changing markets, and acculturation after mergers or acquisitions (Daft & Noe, 2001; Larsson & Lubatkin, 2001; Muchinsky, 2003). These propositions implicate cultural variables as agents of behavior and/or performance change at the individual and group levels of analysis. How does culture achieve these benevolent or malevolent effects during organizational change efforts? How does the OC concept translate into changes in organizational, process, and individual and group performance? Anyone who has contacted the fields of ABA, OBM, or HPT will immediately recognize some potential answers to these questions. However, the difficulty in arriving at specific conceptual strategies lies in the process of using complex information about OC, as it is traditionally conceived and measured, to direct social and technical environmental interventions that directly affect measurable behaviors and results at the individual/group level. Regardless of any conceptual difficulties, competent organizational practitioners should be interested in any variable that might interfere with or facilitate organizational change. Therefore, the general audience for this paper is likely to find a conceptual analysis of this topic to be a worthy investment. The following section is a brief review of the traditional OC concept, followed by a discussion of several arguments for supplementing the OC concept with environmentally oriented strategies for changing behavior and improving performance.

Traditional Definitions of the Organizational Culture Concept

Muchinsky (2003) defined culture as "the languages, values, attitudes, beliefs, and customs of an organization" (p. 261). This definition is a good starting point because it highlights variables common to many definitions of OC. However, the OC literature is broad, with each author adopting a slightly different emphasis on the topic. For example, Robbins (2003) wrote, "There seems to be wide agreement that organizational culture refers to a system of shared meaning [italics added] held by members that distinguishes the organization from other organizations. The system of shared meaning is, on closer examination, a set of key

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?