The Teaching-Family Model and Post-Treatment Recidivism: A Critical Review of the Conventional Wisdom

By Kingsley, David E. | The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, Winter 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Teaching-Family Model and Post-Treatment Recidivism: A Critical Review of the Conventional Wisdom


Kingsley, David E., The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy


Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that the Teaching-Family Model (TFM) approach to treating youthful offenders is not effective in reducing post-treatment recidivism. This article reviews two major studies referenced in support of this widespread perception. Data presented in one widely referenced study are treated with a Cochran-Mantel-Haensel test, which, the author argues, is appropriate for data originally presented in two separate 2 X 2 tables (one for boys and one for girls). The construct and statistical conclusion validity of a major evaluation study presented to the NIMH is critically evaluated and discussed. A revised view of the leading TFM evaluations has implications for public policy regarding juvenile justice. The author suggests that a belief in the lack of post-treatment efficacy associated with community-based residential treatment has resulted in harsher treatment of juveniles and a higher incarceration rate.

Keywords: Teaching Family Model (TFM), Treatment, Juveniles, Recidivism

**********

Can youthful offenders be rehabilitated? In the United States during the past thirty years, this question has engendered ongoing debate and disagreement (Glaser, 1980; Lipton, Martinson & Wilks, 1975; Martinson, 1974; Palmer, 2002; Wilson & Herrnstein, 1985). However, a few decades ago, there was considerable optimism regarding the efficacy of treatment for juvenile delinquents. The Teaching-Family Model, in fact, grew out of a 1960s zeitgeist of all things are possible when it comes to reforming society (Wolf, Braukmann, & Ramp, 1987).

The theoretical underpinnings of the Teaching-Family Model (TFM) have been described as radical behaviorism (Morris & Braukmann, 1987). Delinquency, according to the theory, is the result of behavior deficiency rather than psychopathology (Phillips, Phillips, Fixsen, & Wolf, 1973). As applied to the treatment of adjudicated youth, the radical behaviorist approach is characterized by a "token economy system of reinforcement" (Phillips, et al., 1973, page 75). Youth in treatment receive points for compliance and achievement that can be exchanged for privileges. However, as the program developed in the early years, it became obvious that the teaching, social-interaction aspects of the treatment became "the heart of the program" (Phillips, et al., 1973, page 75).

The process of "give-and-take-instruction, demonstration, practice, feedback," (Phillips, 1973, page 75) is designed to help youth overcome behavior deficiencies and learn prosocial behaviors. Hence, the model is characterized by a small number of youths (eight) in a community-based residential setting managed by a married couple trained in the prescribed techniques (Phillips, Phillips, Fixsen, & Wolf, 1974). The Teaching Family Association developed as an accrediting agency. In general, fidelity to the model necessitates a highly structured program with specific protocols and continuous measures of each youth's behavior.

Early evaluations of the model by researchers responsible for its development at the University of Kansas suggested phenomenally better results of the TFM compared to institutionalization and probation (Phillips, et al., 1973; Kirigin, Wolf, Braukmann, Fixsen, & Phillips, 1979). However, since the early 1980s, it has been widely perceived as a model that lacks efficacy in reducing recidivism. (Fonagy, Target, Cottrell, Phillips, & Kurtz, 2002; Jones, Weinrott, & Howard, 1981; Kirigin, Braukmann, Atwater, & Wolf, 1982; Morris & Braukmann, 1987; Quay, 1986; U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999; Wilson, 1983; Wilson & Herrnstein, 1985).

According to Jenkins (2006), the backlash to the 60s spirit started around 1974. Indeed, in criminology the "nothing works movement" led by Martinson and his colleagues appeared on the scene with a publication in the The Public Interest (Martinson, 1974).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Teaching-Family Model and Post-Treatment Recidivism: A Critical Review of the Conventional Wisdom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?