Securities Litigation Reform Proposals Affect State and Local Governments

By Spain, Catherine L. | Government Finance Review, April 1995 | Go to article overview

Securities Litigation Reform Proposals Affect State and Local Governments


Spain, Catherine L., Government Finance Review


The issue of securities litigation reform has gained considerable attention in the new Congress. Interest was spurred by the introduction of the Common Sense Legal Reforms Act (H.R. 10), a component of the Republican Contract with America, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (H.R. 555) by Representative Edward Markey (D-MA). The issue's relevance to state and local governments was highlighted during recent hearings in the House and Senate on the Orange County, California, bankruptcy. Democrats pointed out that investors who suffered losses in the Orange County Investment Fund would find it more difficult to sue succeswfully if the provisions of H.R. 10 were in effect. Coincidentally, H.R. 10 was introduced by Representative Christopher Cox - a member of the House from Orange County, California.

At its January 1995 meeting, the GFOA Committee on Governmental Debt and Fiscal Policy (the Debt Committee) reviewed litigation reform proposals and adopted the policy statement in the accompanying sidebar that addresses several concerns of state and local governments. The GFOA Executive Board subsequently approved the policy because of the impact of litigation proposals on state and local governments as investors in and issuers of securities.

Impetus for Reform

Litigation reform has been discussed for several years, but the issue's visibility was enhanced with the introduction of legislation in 1993 and 1994 and subsequent congressional hearings. An aggressive lobbying campaign by the accounting profession and high-technology industry representatives has been a significant impetus for reform. Specifically, these business representatives believe that the current system promotes frivolous litigation. Class action lawsuits are a particular source of concern because it is alleged that class counsel may have incentives that differ from those of underlying class members. Finally, the financial burdens imposed on accountants and other advisers who may become the "deep pockets" in litigation settlements have been a strong motivation for reform.

Several recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions also have focused attention on securities litigation reforms. Many believe that the Court is attempting to curb an excess of frivolous litigation by developing new doctrines that could adversely affect meritorious cases. Two cases in particular have been cited. In the 1994 decision Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, the Court reversed 25 years of litigation practice by determining there is no private right of action under the federal securities laws against persons who aid and abet a securities fraud. This position rested on the fact that there is no explicit statutory language imposing aiding and abetting liability. As a result of this decision, investors would not be able to sue accountants and other professionals who substantially assist a securities fraud, even if those persons act knowingly or with a high degree of recklessness. In effect, the Court issued an invitation to the Congress to set the policy on aiding and abetting.

The 1991 Lampf, et al. v. Gilbertson decision held that private actions in the securities area had to be commenced within a year after discovery of the alleged violation and within three years after the violation occurred. Prior to the ruling, there was no uniform limitations period for private actions; courts relied on time limitations established in the most analogous state law. The Lampf limit is a substantially shorter period of time, and once again the Court has tossed the resolution of this issue to Congress because of the unworkability of a shorter period.

Reform Approaches

The various litigation reform bills that have been drafted contain significantly different provisions. Among the major issues addressed in the bills are:

* adoption of the "English Rule" of fee shifting where fees and costs are paid by the losing party rather than each side paying its own fees and costs,

* limits on joint and several liability so that only those professionals participating in a transaction who knowingly commit securities fraud are liable,

* creation of a new disciplinary board to oversee private accountants,

* extension of the statute of limitations applying to the filing of suits,

* litigation management and settlement reforms to weed out frivolous cases and impose sanctions on persons bringing frivolous suits, and

* restoration of the private right of action against persons who substantially aid and abet a securities fraud.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Securities Litigation Reform Proposals Affect State and Local Governments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.