Special Issue: Fair Value in Financial Reporting, Auditing, and Tax Accounting

By Casabona, Patrick A.; Gornik-Tomaszewski, Sylwia | Review of Business, October 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Special Issue: Fair Value in Financial Reporting, Auditing, and Tax Accounting


Casabona, Patrick A., Gornik-Tomaszewski, Sylwia, Review of Business


During most of the last century, standard setters emphasized historical cost accounting. Under this traditional accounting model, the income statement, which results from matching an entity's revenues with expenses during a period of time, was considered the primary financial statement conveying useful information about a company's performance and value to shareholders. The balance sheet was considered a by-product of the matching process, since it contained such categories as prepaid expenses, unearned revenues, accrued expenses, and accrued revenues. Financial statements prepared under the historical cost convention were and are still perceived by many today to be reliable, relatively easy to verify, and straightforward to understand.

Historical cost accounting was sufficient as long as a company's assets consisted mostly of identifiable tangible assets. With the increased prominence of intangible assets, such as intellectual capital, human resources, brand names, technology advances, or corporate culture, this accounting model resulted in under-valuing and under-recording assets that contributed significantly to the achievement of a company's strategic goals and objectives. For example, intangible assets that are recorded in the balance sheet--purchased copyrights, patents, and other legal rights--are recorded at historical cost. Other intangible assets, such as brand assets, assets arising from marketing and supplier relationships, and knowledge assets developed from research and development are not recorded at all. Consequently, great disparities between companies' book and market values have been observed, and the users of financial statements have pressed for more relevant fair-value information.

For the past decade, to improve the decision-making relevance of financial statements, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has been adding more fair value recognition, measurement, and disclosure standards to the body of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) follows a similar approach. As a result, a mixed accounting model has been developed, which is still primarily based on historical cost but with an ever increasing application of fair value accounting. Consequently, a shift has occurred in recent years towards using the balance sheet as the primary financial statement conveying information to shareholders, and the income statement reporting economic income as simply the change in value over a period of time.

Although recent accounting standards reflect increasing acceptance of fair value as a measurement attribute, the shift towards the fair value accounting model has not been without controversies. Fair value accounting information continues to be criticized as being less reliable than historical cost, especially when based on subjective assumptions. Estimation errors introduce distortion not only into the balance sheet, but also into the income statement. Furthermore, unrealized changes in fair values from one period to the next, which must now be reported as gains and losses in financial statements, distort the results of operations, if and when they flow through the income statement each period. And finally, fair value accounting requires proper matching of assets and liabilities, which is even more difficult to implement than the matching of revenues and expenses under a historical cost model.

Existing empirical evidence does not resolve these controversies. Empirical findings suggest that the reliability of fair value estimates varies with the extent to which fair value estimates include publicly observed market-based versus management-produced information. The most consistent evidence regarding the reliability of fair value estimates is found for investment securities traded in active markets. The evidence regarding the reliability of other fair value estimates is rather limited. Furthermore, the empirical research on the reliability of fair value estimates is largely derived from the analysis of banks and other financial institutions for which financial instruments comprise core operating assets and liabilities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Special Issue: Fair Value in Financial Reporting, Auditing, and Tax Accounting
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?