Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Decoding the Rhetoric about Shame

By Gottfried, Paul | Insight on the News, June 19, 1995 | Go to article overview

Decoding the Rhetoric about Shame


Gottfried, Paul, Insight on the News


Insight's May 15 cover story joins Time and Newsweek in agonizing about the new public concern about shame. According to a Newsweek poll taken in February, almost half the American people believe that we have grown lax about enforcing moral standards. An anthology of essays by Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Demoralization of poverty, has created a stir by demonstrating the financial and moral success of the English Poor Law of 1834. Himmelfarb underlines the ability and determination of Victorian England to enforce a work ethic at every level of society. While the widespread fascination with this example is a welcome sign, it is not clear if we are seeing the beginnings of a moral reformation.

For one thing, almost all discussions of the need for shame have been explicitly political or viewed as such by their critics. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and conservative intellectual William Kristol have cited The Demoralization of Poverty in defense of their own efforts to reduce welfare payments to the underclass. Though I find nothing offensive about that project, historical analogies do have their limits. The intensely Protestant, Bible-reading society in which English reformers of the 1830s and 1840s tried to discourage lower-class dependence on the dole was quite different from our own therapeutic political culture. Himmelfarb herself concedes this point and has been cautious about generalizing from the Victorian experience. In any case, the Republican attempt to benefit from her work has begun to backfire.

Democrats have rightly pointed out that Republicans are attacking not the "welfare state" per se, but underclass benefits. "What about government subsidies to dependent Republican farmers?" goes the predictable rhetorical question from the opposition. Meanwhile, the cultural Left has weighed in with its own list of shameworthy acts. Feminist socialist Barbara Ehrenreich wishes to make us ashamed about sexism and to focus our moral anger on employers who pay men more than women. New York Times editorialists are unhappy that we have not done more to embarrass racial bigots. And Newsweek columnist Joel Klein has found other politically incorrect candidates for shame -- capitalists who do not recognize that "enterprise has limits."

This disagreement about the proper causes of shame conceals even deeper divisions about the nature of social morality. In this matter there seems to be less of a national consensus, though agreement does continue to exist in at least some American subcultures. Relatively isolated groups such as the Amish and Orthodox Jews are law-abiding citizens and have few children born out of wedlock. They teach their young not so much reasoned arguments about ethics as the detailed ritual traditions passed down by their ancestors. The overriding strength of these communities is that to do instill a sense of shame about bringing disgrace upon their kin. And for the most part, they have protected themselves from the social disintegration that now is alarming other Americans.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Decoding the Rhetoric about Shame
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.