America's Evolving Problem: This Country Has Long Been Divided-Science versus Religion, Progressive versus Traditionalist. Which Is Why Even the Best-Supported Theory about the Origin of Our Species Is Going to Be an Unnatural Selection for Some

By Ruse, Michael | Science & Spirit, September-October 2005 | Go to article overview

America's Evolving Problem: This Country Has Long Been Divided-Science versus Religion, Progressive versus Traditionalist. Which Is Why Even the Best-Supported Theory about the Origin of Our Species Is Going to Be an Unnatural Selection for Some


Ruse, Michael, Science & Spirit


I HAVE JUST RETURNED from a conference in Paris. It was held on the left bank of the river Seine, at the Jardin des Plantes, in the Grande Gallerie of the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, one of the most beautiful buildings in a city of beautiful buildings. The inside is hollow, with balconies around the sides featuring one of the very best exhibitions on evolution and its mechanisms that I have ever seen. Always packed with visitors, many of whom are schoolchildren, the museum offers one interactive display after another teaching about genetics, classification, and natural selection.

Although the conference was on ecology, I rarely had a chance to speak to the subject. Every French scientist wanted to know what on earth was happening in America. In this day and age, can it really be that there is a major effort to combat the teaching of evolution in schools? Can it be that there are people who want to introduce miracle-based accounts of origins into biology classrooms? Do some people truly believe that the Earth was created a mere 10,000 years ago, in six days, and that Noah's flood is literally true? Does the president of the United States really think that evolution is an open question?

I had to answer that, indeed, it is all true. Everything they had heard, and more. A startling proportion of people in America do not believe in evolution; they really do think that dinosaurs and humans coexisted; and they are absolutely convinced that there was a time, not that long ago, when the plains of the Midwest were covered with water and some chap in an ark stuffed with animals came floating by.

More than this, I had to tell them that I think the situation is going to get worse before it gets better, if indeed it does get better. I see this biblically based version of origins--once known as fundamentalism, then creationism, and now in its latest user-friendly version as intelligent design, or ID--getting into the schools. In August, President George W. Bush endorsed the teaching of ID, telling a small group of reporters that "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought." According to Knight Ridder Newspapers, Bush said students learning about human origins should be exposed to ID alongside evolutionary theory, just as he, as governor of Texas, advocated exposing students to creationism. And if Bush successfully reshapes the Supreme Court--a process that has already begun--we shall see old-fashioned religion taught as part of the science curriculum. At the moment, the creationists are being stealthy: ID is purposefully distinguished from broad biblical literalism. But its supporters are candid about the fact that they have what they call a "wedge" strategy. One bit at a time. First a few miracles, then a few more, and finally all of Genesis absolutely as it is written.

My French friends were baffled. America represents the greatest scientific force the world has ever seen. It gets as many Nobel Prizes each year as the rest of the other countries do combined. How can it be so blind, so stupid, so religious, when it comes to evolution? One might want to argue about the mechanisms of evolution, but to doubt one of the pillars of modern science, in this day and age? Those Americans really are crazy, they concluded, and someone like Michael Ruse, born and educated in England, a long-time philosophy professor in Canada, and now spending his declining years teaching in the American South, must be in his dotage--or a gross hypocrite--for condemning creationists, yet living among them.

Whatever my personal failings may be, my job as a scholar is to try to understand things. Why is creationism alive and well today? Why, in the Western world, is it a uniquely American phenomenon? Is there something about American Christianity that makes it especially susceptible to biblical literalism? A new Associated Press study tells us that only thirty-seven percent of French people claim that religion is important in their lives, whereas eighty-four percent of Americans claim this. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

America's Evolving Problem: This Country Has Long Been Divided-Science versus Religion, Progressive versus Traditionalist. Which Is Why Even the Best-Supported Theory about the Origin of Our Species Is Going to Be an Unnatural Selection for Some
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.